Glaucya Madazio1, Sylvia Leão, Mara Behlau. 1. Human Communication Disorders Department, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. glaumadazio@uol.com.br
Abstract
AIM: To identify the discriminative characteristics of the phonatory deviation diagram (PDD) in rough, breathy and tense voices. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-six samples of normal and dysphonic voices from adults were submitted to perceptual auditory evaluation, focusing on the predominant vocal quality and the degree of deviation. Acoustic analysis was performed with the VoxMetria (CTS Informatica). RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the dysphonic and normal groups (p < 0.001), and also between the breathy and rough samples (p = 0.044) and the breathy and tense samples (p < 0.001). All normal voices were positioned in the inferior left quadrant, 45% of the rough voices in the inferior right quadrant, 52.6% of the breathy voices in the superior right quadrant and 54.3% of the tense voices in the inferior left quadrant of the PDD. In the inferior left quadrant, 93.8% of voices with no deviation were located and 72.7% of voices with mild deviation; voices with moderate deviation were distributed in the inferior and superior right quadrants, the latter ones containing the most deviant voices and 80% of voices with severe deviation. CONCLUSION: The PDD was able to discriminate normal from dysphonic voices, and the distribution was related to the type and degree of voice alteration.
AIM: To identify the discriminative characteristics of the phonatory deviation diagram (PDD) in rough, breathy and tense voices. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-six samples of normal and dysphonic voices from adults were submitted to perceptual auditory evaluation, focusing on the predominant vocal quality and the degree of deviation. Acoustic analysis was performed with the VoxMetria (CTS Informatica). RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the dysphonic and normal groups (p < 0.001), and also between the breathy and rough samples (p = 0.044) and the breathy and tense samples (p < 0.001). All normal voices were positioned in the inferior left quadrant, 45% of the rough voices in the inferior right quadrant, 52.6% of the breathy voices in the superior right quadrant and 54.3% of the tense voices in the inferior left quadrant of the PDD. In the inferior left quadrant, 93.8% of voices with no deviation were located and 72.7% of voices with mild deviation; voices with moderate deviation were distributed in the inferior and superior right quadrants, the latter ones containing the most deviant voices and 80% of voices with severe deviation. CONCLUSION: The PDD was able to discriminate normal from dysphonic voices, and the distribution was related to the type and degree of voice alteration.
Authors: Leonardo Wanderley Lopes; Jonas Almeida de Freitas; Anna Alice Almeida; Priscila Oliveira Costa Silva; Giorvan Ânderson Dos Santos Alves Journal: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-07-05