Literature DB >> 21624902

Non-invasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance with cardiac magnetic resonance.

Ana García-Alvarez1, Leticia Fernández-Friera, Jesús G Mirelis, Simonette Sawit, Ajith Nair, Jill Kallman, Valentin Fuster, Javier Sanz.   

Abstract

AIM: To develop a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) method for non-invasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). METHODS AND
RESULTS: The study comprised 100 consecutive patients with known or suspected pulmonary hypertension (PH; 53 ± 16 years, 73% women) who underwent same-day right heart catheterization (RHC) and CMR. Increased PVR was defined from RHC as >3 WU (n = 66, 66%). From CMR cine and phase-contrast images, right ventricular (RV) volumes and ejection fraction (RVEF), pulmonary artery (PA) flow velocities and areas, and cardiac output were quantified. The best statistical model to estimate PVR was obtained from a derivation cohort (n = 80) based on physiological plausibility and statistical criteria. Validity of the model was assessed in the remaining 20 patients (validation cohort). The CMR-derived model was: estimated PVR (in WU) = 19.38 - [4.62 × Ln PA average velocity (in cm/s)] - [0.08 × RVEF (in %)]. In the validation cohort, the correlation between invasively quantified and CMR-estimated PVR was 0.84 (P < 0.001). The mean bias between the RHC-derived and CMR-estimated PVR was -0.54 (agreement interval -6.02 to 4.94 WU). The CMR model correctly classified 18 (90%) of patients as having normal or increased PVR (area under the receiver operator characteristics curve 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.89-1.00). CONCLUSIONS Non-invasive estimation of PVR using CMR is feasible and may be valuable for PH diagnosis and/or follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21624902     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  22 in total

1.  What does the time constant of the pulmonary circulation tell us about the progression of right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary arterial hypertension?

Authors:  A Bellofiore; Z Wang; N C Chesler
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.017

2.  Pulmonary arterial stiffness assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is a predictor of mild pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Jordan C Ray; Charles Burger; Patricia Mergo; Robert Safford; Joseph Blackshear; Christopher Austin; DeLisa Fairweather; Michael G Heckman; Tonya Zeiger; Marcia Dubin; Brian Shapiro
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension from magnetic resonance imaging-based computational models and decision tree analysis.

Authors:  Angela Lungu; Andrew J Swift; David Capener; David Kiely; Rod Hose; Jim M Wild
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 4.  Hemodynamics should be the primary approach to diagnosing, following, and managing pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Bradley A Maron
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Right Ventricular Function After Pulmonary Artery Banding: Adaptive Processes Assessed by CMR and Conductance Catheter Measurements in Sheep.

Authors:  Hubert Gufler; Sabine Niefeldt; Johannes Boltze; Stephanie Prietz; Christian Klopsch; Sabine Wagner; Brigitte Vollmar; Can Yerebakan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  4D magnetic resonance flow imaging for estimating pulmonary vascular resistance in pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Vitaly O Kheyfets; Michal Schafer; Chris A Podgorski; Joyce D Schroeder; James Browning; Jean Hertzberg; J Kern Buckner; Kendal S Hunter; Robin Shandas; Brett E Fenster
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  A non-invasive assessment of cardiopulmonary hemodynamics with MRI in pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Octavia Bane; Sanjiv J Shah; Michael J Cuttica; Jeremy D Collins; Senthil Selvaraj; Neil R Chatterjee; Christoph Guetter; James C Carr; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Flow characteristics of the proximal pulmonary arteries and vena cava in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: correlation between 3.0 T phase-contrast MRI and right heart catheterization.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Guo; Min Liu; Zhanhong Ma; Shuangkun Wang; Yuanhua Yang; Zhenguo Zhai; Chen Wang; Renyou Zhai
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

9.  Understanding the physiology of complex congenital heart disease using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mahesh Kappanayil; Rajesh Kannan; Raman Krishna Kumar
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-07

Review 10.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of pulmonary hypertension: a practical approach to the current state of the art.

Authors:  Andrew J Swift; Jim M Wild; Scott K Nagle; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Christopher J François; Sean Fain; Kevin Johnson; Dave Capener; Edwin J R van Beek; David G Kiely; Kang Wang; Mark L Schiebler
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.