Steven Q Wang1, Uli Osterwalder2, Katinka Jung3. 1. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: wangs@mskcc.org. 2. BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany. 3. Gematria Test Lab, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: UVA induces tissue damage via the production of radical oxygen species. Adding antioxidants to UV filters in sunscreens is a novel photoprotective strategy. The topical application of antioxidants in sunscreen can potentially neutralize the UVA-induced free radicals. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the degree of free radical protection offered by sunscreens with antioxidants and attempted to differentiate the contribution of free radical protection from that of the UV filters. METHOD: Twelve sunscreen products were purchased. The degree of UVA protection (UVA-PF) was measured via an in vitro assay according to a European guideline (Colipa). In addition, an electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy-based assay was used to measure the radical skin protection factor (RSF) and antioxidant power (AP) of each product. RESULTS: The sun protection factor (SPF) values of the sunscreens ranged from 15 to 55, and the UVA-PF values ranged from 2.4 to 28.2. The RSF values ranged from 2.4 to 27.1. There is a high correlation between RSF and UVA-PF. The AP values for nearly all the products were 0, and two products (#4 and #9) had very low AP values of 16 and 12, respectively. LIMITATIONS: The study only evaluated a small number of sunscreen products, and only ex vivo and in vitro methods were used to assess the products. CONCLUSIONS: The idea of combining UV filters with antioxidants is appealing. Current sunscreen products on the market offer free radical protection, but the majority of the radical protection is from UV filters rather than antioxidants.
BACKGROUND: UVA induces tissue damage via the production of radical oxygen species. Adding antioxidants to UV filters in sunscreens is a novel photoprotective strategy. The topical application of antioxidants in sunscreen can potentially neutralize the UVA-induced free radicals. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the degree of free radical protection offered by sunscreens with antioxidants and attempted to differentiate the contribution of free radical protection from that of the UV filters. METHOD: Twelve sunscreen products were purchased. The degree of UVA protection (UVA-PF) was measured via an in vitro assay according to a European guideline (Colipa). In addition, an electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy-based assay was used to measure the radical skin protection factor (RSF) and antioxidant power (AP) of each product. RESULTS: The sun protection factor (SPF) values of the sunscreens ranged from 15 to 55, and the UVA-PF values ranged from 2.4 to 28.2. The RSF values ranged from 2.4 to 27.1. There is a high correlation between RSF and UVA-PF. The AP values for nearly all the products were 0, and two products (#4 and #9) had very low AP values of 16 and 12, respectively. LIMITATIONS: The study only evaluated a small number of sunscreen products, and only ex vivo and in vitro methods were used to assess the products. CONCLUSIONS: The idea of combining UV filters with antioxidants is appealing. Current sunscreen products on the market offer free radical protection, but the majority of the radical protection is from UV filters rather than antioxidants.
Authors: Sérgio Schalka; Denise Steiner; Flávia Naranjo Ravelli; Tatiana Steiner; Aripuanã Cobério Terena; Carolina Reato Marçon; Eloisa Leis Ayres; Flávia Alvim Sant'anna Addor; Helio Amante Miot; Humberto Ponzio; Ida Duarte; Jane Neffá; José Antônio Jabur da Cunha; Juliana Catucci Boza; Luciana de Paula Samorano; Marcelo de Paula Corrêa; Marcus Maia; Nilton Nasser; Olga Maria Rodrigues Ribeiro Leite; Otávio Sergio Lopes; Pedro Dantas Oliveira; Renata Leal Bregunci Meyer; Tânia Cestari; Vitor Manoel Silva dos Reis; Vitória Regina Pedreira de Almeida Rego Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.896
Authors: Joanna M S Davies; Josiane Cillard; Bertrand Friguet; Enrique Cadenas; Jean Cadet; Rachael Cayce; Andrew Fishmann; David Liao; Anne-Laure Bulteau; Frédéric Derbré; Amélie Rébillard; Steven Burstein; Etienne Hirsch; Robert A Kloner; Michael Jakowec; Giselle Petzinger; Delphine Sauce; Florian Sennlaub; Isabelle Limon; Fulvio Ursini; Matilde Maiorino; Christina Economides; Christian J Pike; Pinchas Cohen; Anne Negre Salvayre; Matthew R Halliday; Adam J Lundquist; Nicolaus A Jakowec; Fatima Mechta-Grigoriou; Mathias Mericskay; Jean Mariani; Zhenlin Li; David Huang; Ellsworth Grant; Henry J Forman; Caleb E Finch; Patrick Y Sun; Laura C D Pomatto; Onnik Agbulut; David Warburton; Christian Neri; Mustapha Rouis; Pierre Cillard; Jacqueline Capeau; Jean Rosenbaum; Kelvin J A Davies Journal: Geroscience Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Min-Sik Kim; Melinda Stees; Bala Vamsi K Karuturi; Sivakumar Vijayaraghavalu; Richard E Peterson; Gary L Madsen; Vinod Labhasetwar Journal: Drug Deliv Transl Res Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 4.617