PURPOSE: Radio-induced early skin reactions still remain a clinical challenge. Preliminary results with Hyaluronic acid, one of the most recent topical products used in this indication are proving interesting. To evaluate the efficacy of Hyaluronic acid compared to placebo. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Breast cancer patients with grade 1-2 radio-induced dermatitis during postoperative radiotherapy were eligible. They were randomised to receive either hyaluronic acid (A) or a simple emollient (B). The primary endpoint was the clinical evaluation of the erythema (success versus failure). Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of skin colorimetry, pain, and quality of life. RESULTS:Two-hundred patients were enrolled (A=99, B=101). Ninety-five patients per treatment arm could be evaluated. Failures occurred in 23 patients (24%) in the hyaluronic acid arm, and 32 (34%) in the emollient arm (p=0.15). Seventy-three patients (36.5%) prematurely stopped the treatment without any ensuing difference between the two arms. Body mass index and the size of the epithelitis were both independently associated with the failure of the local treatment. The relative reduction of colorimetric levels was 20% in the hyaluronic acid group, and 13% in the emollient group (p=0.46). Concerning the quality of life assessment, there was a trend towards a lower level of pain in patients receiving hyaluronic acid (p=0.053). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed no significant difference between hyaluronic acid and simple emollient in the treatment of acute radio-induced dermatitis. There was however a trend towards an improvement in both pain level and skin colorimetry.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Radio-induced early skin reactions still remain a clinical challenge. Preliminary results with Hyaluronic acid, one of the most recent topical products used in this indication are proving interesting. To evaluate the efficacy of Hyaluronic acid compared to placebo. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Breast cancerpatients with grade 1-2 radio-induced dermatitis during postoperative radiotherapy were eligible. They were randomised to receive either hyaluronic acid (A) or a simple emollient (B). The primary endpoint was the clinical evaluation of the erythema (success versus failure). Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of skin colorimetry, pain, and quality of life. RESULTS: Two-hundred patients were enrolled (A=99, B=101). Ninety-five patients per treatment arm could be evaluated. Failures occurred in 23 patients (24%) in the hyaluronic acid arm, and 32 (34%) in the emollient arm (p=0.15). Seventy-three patients (36.5%) prematurely stopped the treatment without any ensuing difference between the two arms. Body mass index and the size of the epithelitis were both independently associated with the failure of the local treatment. The relative reduction of colorimetric levels was 20% in the hyaluronic acid group, and 13% in the emollient group (p=0.46). Concerning the quality of life assessment, there was a trend towards a lower level of pain in patients receiving hyaluronic acid (p=0.053). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed no significant difference between hyaluronic acid and simple emollient in the treatment of acute radio-induced dermatitis. There was however a trend towards an improvement in both pain level and skin colorimetry.
Authors: Rebecca K S Wong; René-Jean Bensadoun; Christine B Boers-Doets; Jane Bryce; Alexandre Chan; Joel B Epstein; Beth Eaby-Sandy; Mario E Lacouture Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Heather Greenlee; Lynda G Balneaves; Linda E Carlson; Misha Cohen; Gary Deng; Dawn Hershman; Matthew Mumber; Jane Perlmutter; Dugald Seely; Ananda Sen; Suzanna M Zick; Debu Tripathy Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2014-11
Authors: Gilda G Hillman; Vinita Singh-Gupta; Fulvio Lonardo; David J Hoogstra; Lisa M Abernathy; Christopher K Yunker; Shoshana E Rothstein; Joseph Rakowski; Fazlul H Sarkar; Shirish Gadgeel; Andre A Konski; Michael C Joiner Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Asal Rahimi; Osama Mohamad; Kevin Albuquerque; D W Nathan Kim; Diana Chen; Kimberly Thomas; Rachel Wooldridge; Aeisha Rivers; Marilyn Leitch; Roshni Rao; Barbara Haley; Chul Ahn; Dan Garwood; Ann Spangler Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Heather Greenlee; Melissa J DuPont-Reyes; Lynda G Balneaves; Linda E Carlson; Misha R Cohen; Gary Deng; Jillian A Johnson; Matthew Mumber; Dugald Seely; Suzanna M Zick; Lindsay M Boyce; Debu Tripathy Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 508.702