OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and potential clinical value of intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) on urethral margin (UM) tissue during radical prostatectomy. Positive surgical margins increase the risk of post-operative cancer recurrence. Positive surgical margins are frequently found at the apex. The utility of intraoperative FSA of the margins is controversial. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of radical prostatectomy cases (n = 1669) performed at our institution, in which UMs were routinely evaluated by intraoperative FSA. RESULTS: The submitted UM tissue contained cancer glands in 111 cases (6.7%). On FSA, the pathologists detected cancer in 55 cases (3.3%), missed cancer in 38 (2.3%), and reported atypical glands in 18 (1.1%). FSA of the UMs had a sensitivity of 59.1%, specificity of 99.8%, and positive and negative predictive value of 94.8% and 97.6%, respectively. The low sensitivity resulted from a substantial false-negative rate (n = 38), which was largely attributed to limited sampling on FSA (n = 31). Of the 55 patients (3.3%) whose positive UMs were detected by FSA, 20 (1.2%) had cancer-free margins after tissue re-excision. A positive final UM was associated with greater biochemical recurrence (P = .0073). However, the few patients limited the statistical analysis of the benefit of margin conversion through tissue re-excision (P = .35). CONCLUSIONS: Although experienced pathologists can evaluate the UMs on FSA with good accuracy, FSA has a relatively low sensitivity. Our data have indicated a low yield and a questionable value of routine FSA during radical prostatectomy.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and potential clinical value of intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) on urethral margin (UM) tissue during radical prostatectomy. Positive surgical margins increase the risk of post-operative cancer recurrence. Positive surgical margins are frequently found at the apex. The utility of intraoperative FSA of the margins is controversial. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of radical prostatectomy cases (n = 1669) performed at our institution, in which UMs were routinely evaluated by intraoperative FSA. RESULTS: The submitted UM tissue contained cancer glands in 111 cases (6.7%). On FSA, the pathologists detected cancer in 55 cases (3.3%), missed cancer in 38 (2.3%), and reported atypical glands in 18 (1.1%). FSA of the UMs had a sensitivity of 59.1%, specificity of 99.8%, and positive and negative predictive value of 94.8% and 97.6%, respectively. The low sensitivity resulted from a substantial false-negative rate (n = 38), which was largely attributed to limited sampling on FSA (n = 31). Of the 55 patients (3.3%) whose positive UMs were detected by FSA, 20 (1.2%) had cancer-free margins after tissue re-excision. A positive final UM was associated with greater biochemical recurrence (P = .0073). However, the few patients limited the statistical analysis of the benefit of margin conversion through tissue re-excision (P = .35). CONCLUSIONS: Although experienced pathologists can evaluate the UMs on FSA with good accuracy, FSA has a relatively low sensitivity. Our data have indicated a low yield and a questionable value of routine FSA during radical prostatectomy.
Authors: Mei Wang; David B Tulman; Andrew B Sholl; Hillary Z Kimbrell; Sree H Mandava; Katherine N Elfer; Samuel Luethy; Michael M Maddox; Weil Lai; Benjamin R Lee; J Quincy Brown Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 4.379