Literature DB >> 21624474

Effect of external auditory pacing on the neural activity of stuttering speakers.

Akira Toyomura1, Tetsunoshin Fujii, Shinya Kuriki.   

Abstract

External auditory pacing, such as metronome sound and speaking in unison with others, has a fluency-enhancing effect in stuttering speakers. The present study investigated the neural mechanism of the fluency-enhancing effect by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). 12 stuttering speakers and 12 nonstuttering controls were scanned while performing metronome-timed speech, choral speech, and normal speech. Compared to nonstuttering controls, stuttering speakers showed a significantly greater increase in activation in the superior temporal gyrus under both metronome-timed and choral speech conditions relative to a normal speech condition. The caudate, globus pallidus, and putamen of the basal ganglia showed clearly different patterns of signal change from rest among the different conditions and between stuttering and nonstuttering speakers. The signal change of stuttering speakers was significantly lower than that of nonstuttering controls under the normal speech condition but was raised to the level of the controls, with no intergroup difference, in metronome-timed speech. In contrast, under the chorus condition the signal change of stuttering speakers remained lower than that of the controls. Correlation analysis further showed that the signal change of the basal ganglia and motor areas was negatively correlated with stuttering severity, but it was not significantly correlated with the stuttering rate during MRI scanning. These findings shed light on the specific neural processing of stuttering speakers when they time their speech to auditory stimuli, and provide additional evidence of the efficacy of external auditory pacing.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21624474     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  35 in total

Review 1.  The Neurobiological Grounding of Persistent Stuttering: from Structure to Function.

Authors:  Nicole E Neef; Alfred Anwander; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Neural network connectivity differences in children who stutter.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; David C Zhu
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Anomalous morphology in left hemisphere motor and premotor cortex of children who stutter.

Authors:  Emily O Garnett; Ho Ming Chow; Alfonso Nieto-Castañón; Jason A Tourville; Frank H Guenther; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Functional and Neuroanatomical Bases of Developmental Stuttering: Current Insights.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; Emily O Garnett; Andrew Etchell; Ho Ming Chow
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 7.519

6.  Dissociations among linguistic, cognitive, and auditory-motor neuroanatomical domains in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ai Leen Choo; Evamarie Burnham; Kristin Hicks; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  Adults who stutter and metronome synchronization: evidence for a nonspeech timing deficit.

Authors:  Anastasia G Sares; Mickael L D Deroche; Douglas M Shiller; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  A voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis of regional grey and white matter volume abnormalities within the speech production network of children who stutter.

Authors:  Deryk S Beal; Vincent L Gracco; Jane Brettschneider; Robert M Kroll; Luc F De Nil
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Evidence for a rhythm perception deficit in children who stutter.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wieland; J Devin McAuley; Laura C Dilley; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Stuttering, induced fluency, and natural fluency: a hierarchical series of activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses.

Authors:  Kristin S Budde; Daniel S Barron; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.