Literature DB >> 21624411

Immunogenicity and safety of inactivated influenza vaccines in primed populations: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

W E P Beyer1, J J P Nauta, A M Palache, K M Giezeman, A D M E Osterhaus.   

Abstract

Several inactivated influenza vaccine formulations for systemic administration in man are currently available for annual (seasonal) immunization: split virus and subunit (either plain-aqueous, or virosomal, or adjuvanted by MF59). From a literature search covering the period 1978-2009, 33 articles could be identified, which described randomized clinical trials comparing at least two of the four vaccine formulations with respect to serum hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody response, local and systemic vaccine reactions and serious adverse events after vaccination, and employing seasonal vaccine components and doses. In total, 9121 vaccinees of all ages, either healthy or with underlying diseases, were involved. Most vaccinees were primed or had been vaccinated in previous years. For immunogenicity, homologous post-vaccination geometric mean HI titers (GMTs) were analyzed by a random effects model for continuous data. Unreported standard deviations (SD) were addressed by imputing assumed SD-values. Age and health state of the vaccinees appeared to have little influence on the outcome. The immunogenicity of split, aqueous and virosomal subunit formulations were similar, with geometric mean ratio values (GMR, quotient of paired GMT-values) varying around one (0.93-1.24). The MF59-adjuvanted subunit vaccine induced, on average, larger antibody titers than the non-adjuvanted vaccine formulations, but the absolute increase was small (GMR-values varying between 1.25 and 1.40). Vaccine reactions were analyzed using a random effects model for binary data. Local and systemic reactogenicity was similar among non-adjuvanted formulations. The adjuvanted subunit formulation was more frequently associated with local reactions than the non-adjuvanted formulations (rate ratio: 2.12, significant). Systemic reactions were similar among all vaccine formulations. The original articles emphasized the mild and transient character of the vaccine reactions and the absence of serious vaccine-related adverse events. This adequate amount of evidence led to the conclusion that all the currently available inactivated influenza vaccine formulations are safe, well tolerated and similarly effective to control seasonal influenza outbreaks across primed populations and age ranges.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21624411     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  34 in total

1.  [Vaccination in the elderly].

Authors:  A Kwetkat; M W Pletz
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  Influenza virosomes supplemented with GPI-0100 adjuvant: a potent vaccine formulation for antigen dose sparing.

Authors:  Heng Liu; Jacqueline de Vries-Idema; Wouter Ter Veer; Jan Wilschut; Anke Huckriede
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Adult preferences for influenza vaccines with lower likelihood of side effects.

Authors:  Paul V Effler; Stephania Tomlin; Sarah Joyce; Donna B Mak
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Immunogenicity and safety of cell-derived MF59®-adjuvanted A/H1N1 influenza vaccine for children.

Authors:  Markus Knuf; Geert Leroux-Roels; Hans Rümke; Luis Rivera; Paola Pedotti; Ashwani Kumar Arora; Maria Lattanzi; Dorothee Kieninger; Giovanni Della Cioppa
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Prevention and treatment of respiratory viral infections: Presentations on antivirals, traditional therapies and host-directed interventions at the 5th ISIRV Antiviral Group conference.

Authors:  Jennifer L McKimm-Breschkin; Shibo Jiang; David S Hui; John H Beigel; Elena A Govorkova; Nelson Lee
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.970

6.  Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2011-2012: An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI).

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2011-10-14

Review 7.  Adjuvanted influenza vaccines.

Authors:  John S Tregoning; Ryan F Russell; Ekaterina Kinnear
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  [Vaccination in advanced age].

Authors:  H J Heppner; A Leischker; P Wutzler; A Kwetkat
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 9.  Targeting the skin for microneedle delivery of influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Dimitrios G Koutsonanos; Richard W Compans; Ioanna Skountzou
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  "Trivalent influenza vaccination of healthy adults 3 years after the onset of swine-origin H1N1 pandemic: restricted immunogenicity of the new A/H1N1v constituent?".

Authors:  R Allwinn; M Bickel; C Lassmann; S Wicker; I Friedrichs
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.