Literature DB >> 21623560

Endoscopic submucosal dissection in a European setting. A multi-institutional report of a technique in development.

S Farhat1, S Chaussade, T Ponchon, D Coumaros, A Charachon, T Barrioz, S Koch, P Houcke, C Cellier, D Heresbach, V Lepilliez, B Napoleon, P Bauret, E Coron, M Le Rhun, P Bichard, E Vaillant, A Calazel, E Bensoussan, S Bellon, L Mangialavori, F Robin, F Prat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique for "en bloc" resection of superficial tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. In France, experience with this technique is still limited. We wanted to assess the development of ESD in France, with special attention to short term outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Members of the Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive (SFED) who declared performing ESD reported their cases prospectively on a voluntary basis. Demographic, clinical, and technical data, and the results of immediate complications were collected. Case reports were completed prospectively by each investigator before pooled analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 188 consecutive case reports were collected from 16 centers. The median case mix per center was 6 patients (range 1-43). The lesion sites treated by ESD were the stomach (n = 75), esophagus (n = 27), duodenum (n = 1), cecum (n = 2), right colon (n = 3), transverse colon (n = 5), sigmoid (n = 3), and rectum (n = 72). The median size of the lesions was 26 mm (range 2-150 mm). En bloc resection was achieved in 77.1% of cases, with complete R0 resection in 72.9%. Histopathology results showed high grade dysplasia or superficial cancer in 71.2%. The median duration of ESD was 105 minutes (range 20-450 minutes). The short term morbidity was 29.2% including 34 cases of perforation (18.1%), and 21 hemorrhages (11.2%) during the 24 hours following ESD, 89% of which were managed conservatively or endoscopically.
CONCLUSION: In this early experience, the feasibility of ESD appeared to be good but R0 resection and complication rates did not match those reported by Japanese authors and must be improved by an extended practice. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21623560     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  51 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection--current success and future directions.

Authors:  Hironori Yamamoto
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Delayed esophageal perforation occurring with endoscopic submucosal dissection: A report of two cases.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Matsuda; Naoki Kataoka; Tomoyuki Yamaguchi; Masafumi Tomita; Kazuki Sakamoto; Shinichiro Makimoto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-07-27

3.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy affects postoperative outcomes and functional results in patients treated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasms.

Authors:  G Rizzo; D P Pafundi; F Sionne; L D'Agostino; G Pietricola; M A Gambacorta; V Valentini; C Coco
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for malignant esophageal lesions.

Authors:  Hazem Hammad; Tonya Kaltenbach; Roy Soetikno
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014

5.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery after endoscopic resection of malignant rectal polyps: a useful technique for indication to radical treatment.

Authors:  Simone Arolfo; Marco Ettore Allaix; Marco Migliore; Francesca Cravero; Alberto Arezzo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal adenomas: Only for expert centers?

Authors:  Mario Anders; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  The expansion of endoscopic submucosal dissection in France: A prospective nationwide survey.

Authors:  Maximilien Barret; Vincent Lepilliez; Dimitri Coumaros; Stanislas Chaussade; Sarah Leblanc; Thierry Ponchon; Fabien Fumex; Edouard Chabrun; Paul Bauret; Christophe Cellier; Emmanuel Coron; Philippe Bichard; Philippe Bulois; Antoine Charachon; Gabriel Rahmi; Serge Bellon; Marc Lerhun; Jean-Pierre Arpurt; Stéphane Koch; Bertrand Napoleon; Eric Vaillant; Anouk Esch; Said Farhat; Francoise Robin; Nadira Kaddour; Frédéric Prat
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous esophageal neoplasia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joon Sung Kim; Byung-Wook Kim; In-Soo Shin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Clinicopathologic factors and outcomes of histologic discrepancy between differentiated and undifferentiated types after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Choong Nam Shim; Hyunki Kim; Dong Wook Kim; Hyun Soo Chung; Jun Chul Park; Hyuk Lee; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Size discrepancy between endoscopic size and pathologic size is not negligible in endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Choong Nam Shim; Mi Kyung Song; Dae Ryong Kang; Hyun Soo Chung; Jun Chul Park; Hyuk Lee; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.