PURPOSE: Because only one-third of eligible patients participate in formal cardiac rehabilitation, home-based programs constitute a suitable alternative. We examined effectiveness of a minimal educational intervention on patient fitness and activity levels through the use of simple motivational tools including verbal encouragement and the provision of a booklet containing exercise guidelines and exercise diary. METHODS: We enrolled 186 patients (age, 60 – 78 years; mean age, 69 years; 140 men) who were admitted to the outpatient clinic of Warsaw Institute of Cardiology in 2007-2009 after acute myocardial infarction. Of these, 61.3% had coronary angioplasty with stenting and 30.7% had coronary artery bypass. Patients were randomly assigned into an intervention group receiving minimal educational intervention or control. At baseline and 3 months, assessment was made of cardiopulmonary fitness and autonomic tone with exercise testing. Leisure-time physical activity and atherosclerosis risk factors were assessed at baseline and after 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: At baseline, exercise test results and leisure-time activity levels were not significantly different between groups. After 3 months, we noted statistically significant differences in exercise test responses between the intervention group versus control: peak workload 57.3 ± 2.3 versus 47.2 ± 2.2 kJ (P < .04) and heart rate recovery 26.5 3.3 versus 23.7 4.2 bpm (P < .001). Leisure-time activity was greater in the intervention group than in control, 3.9 versus 2.3 h/wk (P < .001). Improvement in atherosclerosis risk factors during the course of the study was similar between groups. CONCLUSION:Minimal educational intervention is an effective and safe form of promoting physical activity in older patients after myocardial infarction.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Because only one-third of eligible patients participate in formal cardiac rehabilitation, home-based programs constitute a suitable alternative. We examined effectiveness of a minimal educational intervention on patient fitness and activity levels through the use of simple motivational tools including verbal encouragement and the provision of a booklet containing exercise guidelines and exercise diary. METHODS: We enrolled 186 patients (age, 60 – 78 years; mean age, 69 years; 140 men) who were admitted to the outpatient clinic of Warsaw Institute of Cardiology in 2007-2009 after acute myocardial infarction. Of these, 61.3% had coronary angioplasty with stenting and 30.7% had coronary artery bypass. Patients were randomly assigned into an intervention group receiving minimal educational intervention or control. At baseline and 3 months, assessment was made of cardiopulmonary fitness and autonomic tone with exercise testing. Leisure-time physical activity and atherosclerosis risk factors were assessed at baseline and after 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: At baseline, exercise test results and leisure-time activity levels were not significantly different between groups. After 3 months, we noted statistically significant differences in exercise test responses between the intervention group versus control: peak workload 57.3 ± 2.3 versus 47.2 ± 2.2 kJ (P < .04) and heart rate recovery 26.5 3.3 versus 23.7 4.2 bpm (P < .001). Leisure-time activity was greater in the intervention group than in control, 3.9 versus 2.3 h/wk (P < .001). Improvement in atherosclerosis risk factors during the course of the study was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Minimal educational intervention is an effective and safe form of promoting physical activity in older patients after myocardial infarction.
Authors: Gianni Mazzoni; Andrea Raisi; Jonathan Myers; Ross Arena; Leonard Kaminsky; Valentina Zerbini; Rosario Lordi; Giorgio Chiaranda; Simona Mandini; Gianluigi Sella; Elisabetta Tonet; Gianluca Campo; Giovanni Grazzi Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2022-01-08 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Lindsey Anderson; Georgina A Sharp; Rebecca J Norton; Hasnain Dalal; Sarah G Dean; Kate Jolly; Aynsley Cowie; Anna Zawada; Rod S Taylor Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-06-30
Authors: Abdelaziz Elnaggar; Van Ta Park; Sei J Lee; Melinda Bender; Lee Anne Siegmund; Linda G Park Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 5.428