Literature DB >> 21623201

Biomarker expression in pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma: comparison of ovarian and omental sites.

Martin Köbel1, Dmitry Turbin, Steve E Kalloger, Dongxia Gao, David G Huntsman, C Blake Gilks.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy has an emerging role in the treatment of high-stage ovarian carcinoma. Some ovarian carcinoma subtypes do not respond well to standard chemotherapy, making accurate subtype diagnosis before starting therapy important. This diagnosis is frequently based on omental biopsy specimens. In particular, with very small biopsies, immunostaining for diagnostic biomarkers may be needed. To assess intratumoral heterogeneity of biomarker expression in pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma, we compared the expression of a set of 10 biomarkers between ovarian and omental sites. Tissue microarrays were constructed from 123 high-grade serous carcinomas with paired ovarian and omental tumor samples. These samples were stained with biomarkers that have been used in ovarian carcinoma subtype diagnosis (WT1, TP53/p53, MUC16/CA125, CDKN2A/p16), and with biomarkers of the tumor microenvironment (CD8, CD163, SPARC, PDGFRB), cell adhesion (CDH1/E-Cadherin), and proliferation (Ki67) as well. Expression frequencies in samples from the 2 sites were compared, as was concordance at the 2 sites for individual tumors. The 2 markers of desmoplastic stromal response (PDGFRB, SPARC) were more frequently expressed in the omentum compared with the ovary (P<0.001; McNemar test). The other 8 markers did not show a significant difference in the frequency of expression between sites. Within individual cases, some markers such as Ki67 and CDKN2A showed variability, indicating that these markers are affected by intratumoral heterogeneity. The intratumoral variability for MUC16, TP53, and WT1 was modest. Commonly used diagnostic markers, such as TP53 and WT1, show little variability between ovarian and omental sites, suggesting that they can be successfully used in small biopsy specimens from extraovarian sites. In contrast, markers of host stromal response do vary between sites, suggesting a biologic difference of the microenvironment at different sites that should be taken into account when tissue-based research is carried out.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21623201     DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e31820d20ba

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol        ISSN: 0277-1691            Impact factor:   2.762


  15 in total

1.  Clinicopathological heterogeneity in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: a study on individual therapy practice.

Authors:  Yuji Matsuo; Hironori Tashiro; Hiroyuki Yanai; Takuya Moriya; Hidetaka Katabuchi
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 2.  Therapeutic Targeting of Epithelial Plasticity Programs: Focus on the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition.

Authors:  Reem Malek; Hailun Wang; Kekoa Taparra; Phuoc T Tran
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.481

Review 3.  E-cadherin's dark side: possible role in tumor progression.

Authors:  Fausto J Rodriguez; Laura J Lewis-Tuffin; Panos Z Anastasiadis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-03-13

Review 4.  Histopathological markers of treatment response and recurrence risk in ovarian cancers and borderline tumors.

Authors:  S Avril
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 5.  EMT, MET, Plasticity, and Tumor Metastasis.

Authors:  Basil Bakir; Anna M Chiarella; Jason R Pitarresi; Anil K Rustgi
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 20.808

6.  A tumor-stroma targeted oncolytic adenovirus replicated in human ovary cancer samples and inhibited growth of disseminated solid tumors in mice.

Authors:  M Veronica Lopez; Angel A Rivera; Diego L Viale; Lorena Benedetti; Nicasio Cuneo; Kristopher J Kimball; Minghui Wang; Joanne T Douglas; Zeng B Zhu; Alicia I Bravo; Manuel Gidekel; Ronald D Alvarez; David T Curiel; Osvaldo L Podhajcer
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 7.  Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in a Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Jennifer Pasquier; Nadine Abu-Kaoud; Haya Al Thani; Arash Rafii
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.375

8.  Type-specific cell line models for type-specific ovarian cancer research.

Authors:  Michael S Anglesio; Kimberly C Wiegand; Nataliya Melnyk; Christine Chow; Clara Salamanca; Leah M Prentice; Janine Senz; Winnie Yang; Monique A Spillman; Dawn R Cochrane; Karey Shumansky; Sohrab P Shah; Steve E Kalloger; David G Huntsman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The use of ovarian cancer cells from patients undergoing surgery to generate primary cultures capable of undergoing functional analysis.

Authors:  Rachel L O Donnell; Aiste McCormick; Asima Mukhopadhyay; Laura C Woodhouse; Madeleine Moat; Anna Grundy; Michelle Dixon; Angelika Kaufman; San Soohoo; Ahmed Elattar; Nicola J Curtin; Richard J Edmondson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Understanding and addressing barriers to successful adenovirus-based virotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rebeca Gonzalez-Pastor; Peter S Goedegebuure; David T Curiel
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 5.987

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.