PURPOSE: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is usually fatal, and innovative approaches targeting growth pathways are necessary to effectively treat this disease. Both the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/c-Met pathways are overexpressed in HNSCC and initiate similar downstream signaling pathways. c-Met may act in consort with EGFR and/or be activated as a compensatory pathway in the presence of EGFR blockade. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression levels of EGFR and c-Met were determined by Western analysis in HNSCC cell lines and correlated with antitumor responses to inhibitors of these pathways. RESULTS: Combining the c-Met inhibitor PF2341066 with the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib abrogated HNSCC cell proliferation, invasion, and wound healing significantly more than inhibition of each pathway alone in HNSCC cell lines. When both HGF and the EGFR ligand, TGF-α, were present in vitro, P-AKT and P-MAPK expression were maximally inhibited by targeting both EGFR and c-Met pathways, suggesting that c-Met or EGFR can compensate when phosphorylation of the other receptor is inhibited. We also showed that TGF-α can induce phosphorylation of c-Met over sixfold by 8 hours in the absence of HGF, supporting a ligand-independent mechanism. Combined targeting of c-Met and EGFR resulted in an enhanced inhibition of tumor volumes accompanied by a decreased number of proliferating cells and increased apoptosis compared with single agent treatment in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these results suggest that dual blockade of c-Met and EGFR may be a promising clinical therapeutic strategy for treating HNSCC.
PURPOSE: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is usually fatal, and innovative approaches targeting growth pathways are necessary to effectively treat this disease. Both the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/c-Met pathways are overexpressed in HNSCC and initiate similar downstream signaling pathways. c-Met may act in consort with EGFR and/or be activated as a compensatory pathway in the presence of EGFR blockade. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression levels of EGFR and c-Met were determined by Western analysis in HNSCC cell lines and correlated with antitumor responses to inhibitors of these pathways. RESULTS: Combining the c-Met inhibitor PF2341066 with the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib abrogated HNSCC cell proliferation, invasion, and wound healing significantly more than inhibition of each pathway alone in HNSCC cell lines. When both HGF and the EGFR ligand, TGF-α, were present in vitro, P-AKT and P-MAPK expression were maximally inhibited by targeting both EGFR and c-Met pathways, suggesting that c-Met or EGFR can compensate when phosphorylation of the other receptor is inhibited. We also showed that TGF-α can induce phosphorylation of c-Met over sixfold by 8 hours in the absence of HGF, supporting a ligand-independent mechanism. Combined targeting of c-Met and EGFR resulted in an enhanced inhibition of tumor volumes accompanied by a decreased number of proliferating cells and increased apoptosis compared with single agent treatment in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these results suggest that dual blockade of c-Met and EGFR may be a promising clinical therapeutic strategy for treating HNSCC.
Authors: Dean E Hammond; Russell Hyde; Irina Kratchmarova; Robert J Beynon; Blagoy Blagoev; Michael J Clague Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Denis Soulieres; Neil N Senzer; Everett E Vokes; Manuel Hidalgo; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Lillian L Siu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laura P Stabile; Mary E Rothstein; Phouthone Keohavong; Jide Jin; Jinling Yin; Stephanie R Land; Sanja Dacic; The Minh Luong; K Jin Kim; Austin M Dulak; Jill M Siegfried Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: P Stanton; S Richards; J Reeves; M Nikolic; K Edington; L Clark; G Robertson; D Souter; R Mitchell; F J Hendler Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Christoph Spiess; Mark Merchant; Arthur Huang; Zhong Zheng; Nai-Ying Yang; Jing Peng; Diego Ellerman; Whitney Shatz; Dorothea Reilly; Daniel G Yansura; Justin M Scheer Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2013-07-07 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Hanneke Stegeman; Johannes H Kaanders; Albert J van der Kogel; Mari Iida; Deric L Wheeler; Paul N Span; Johan Bussink Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Aiwu Ruth He; Roger B Cohen; Crystal S Denlinger; Ashwin Sama; Ariel Birnbaum; Jimmy Hwang; Takami Sato; Nancy Lewis; Michelle Mynderse; Michele Niland; Jennifer Giles; Johan Wallin; Brian Moser; Wei Zhang; Richard Walgren; Elizabeth R Plimack Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-03-04
Authors: Laura P Stabile; Guoqing He; Vivian Wai Yan Lui; Sufi Thomas; Cassandra Henry; Christopher T Gubish; Sonali Joyce; Kelly M Quesnelle; Jill M Siegfried; Jennifer R Grandis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: X Tao; K S Hill; I Gaziova; S K Sastry; S Qui; P Szaniszlo; S Fennewald; V A Resto; L A Elferink Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 5.337