Literature DB >> 2162244

Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in women augmented with silicone gel-filled implants.

M J Silverstein1, E D Gierson, P Gamagami, N Handel, J R Waisman.   

Abstract

From 1981 through 1988, 35 patients with prior augmentation mammoplasty were treated for breast carcinoma. Thirty-two patients had unilateral infiltrating carcinomas; three had noninvasive (in situ) lesions. Thirty-four of 35 (97%) lesions were palpable. One noninvasive cancer was occult, discovered mammographically in the absence of physical findings. Prebiopsy mammography was performed in 29 patients with palpable masses and failed to reveal an abnormality in 12 patients, a false-negative rate of 41%. Fifteen patients were treated with mastectomy; the remaining 20 with breast preservation. Thirty-two patients underwent axillary node dissection; 15 (47%) patients had lymph node metastases. There have been seven (20%) recurrences: one local and six metastatic. Four (11%) patients have died. The median follow-up time is 48 months. Women, previously augmented with silicone gel-filled implants, who develop breast cancer are similar in terms of nodal positivity and prognosis, to nonaugmented breast cancer patients who present with palpable masses. When compared with nonaugmented women whose cancers were found with screening mammography, augmented patients with breast cancer present with a higher percentage of invasive lesion and involved axillary lymph nodes, resulting in a poorer prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2162244     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900701)66:1<97::aid-cncr2820660118>3.0.co;2-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

1.  Breast implants: quo vadis?

Authors:  H J Berkel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Breast cancer after augmentation mammoplasty with silicone gel-filled implant: a case report.

Authors:  M Tun; M Madhavan
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  1999-07

Review 3.  The effect of study design biases on the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting silicone breast implant ruptures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Lillian T Bellfi; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Breast implant illness: a topic in review.

Authors:  Jordan Kaplan; Rod Rohrich
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

5.  Breast cancer after breast augmentation with silicone implants.

Authors:  A C Cahan; R Ashikari; P Pressman; H Cody; S Hoffman; J E Sherman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  The Impact of Implant Location on Breast Cancer Characteristics in Previously Augmented Patients: A Systematic Literature Analysis.

Authors:  Alain Joe Azzi; Jordan Gornitsky; Alex Viezel-Mathieu; Lucie Lessard
Journal:  J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-06-30

7.  Stage of breast cancer at diagnosis among women with cosmetic breast implants.

Authors:  L R Hölmich; L Mellemkjaer; K A Gunnarsdóttir; U B Tange; C Krag; S Møller; J K McLaughlin; J H Olsen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.