Literature DB >> 21621862

A clinical narrative review of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in neonates with Pierre Robin sequence.

Paul Hong1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal upper airway obstruction secondary to micrognathia can be managed with conservative or surgical interventions. Traditionally, severe upper airway obstruction was managed with a tracheostomy. Although tracheostomy may be life saving, it is associated with high rates of complications and can lead to developmental problems. More recently, mandibular distraction osteogenesis has been utilized to relieve micrognathia associated airway obstruction.
METHODS: A clinical narrative review of the current literature was performed to evaluate the efficacy of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in neonates with Pierre Robin sequence.
OBJECTIVES: (1) To evaluate whether mandibular distraction osteogenesis can relieve the upper airway obstruction in micrognathic neonates and (2) to discuss and increase the awareness of various issues surrounding neonatal mandibular distraction procedures including preoperative workup, distraction protocols, and complications.
RESULTS: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis can be a safe and effective intervention in neonates diagnosed with Pierre Robin sequence with severe micrognathia and airway obstruction. Interestingly, in patients with additional complex syndromes, the airway obstruction was not consistently alleviated.
CONCLUSION: When conservative measures fail, mandibular distraction osteogenesis should be considered to obviate the need for a tracheostomy in newborns with micrognathia associated upper airway obstruction.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21621862     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  7 in total

Review 1.  Imaging neonates and children with Pierre Robin sequence before and after mandibular distraction osteogenesis: what the craniofacial surgeon wants to know.

Authors:  Arthur B Meyers; Markus G Zei; Arlen D Denny
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-03-20

2.  Mandibular Distraction in a Patient With Type II Collagenopathy.

Authors:  Rebecca M Garza; Jennifer C Alyono; David W Dorfman; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 3.  Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery: Demystifying Differences in Concepts, Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Manikandhan Ramanathan; Godwin Alex Kiruba; Amelia Christabel; Anantanarayanan Parameswaran; Sanjanaa Kapoor; Hermann F Sailer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-21

Review 4.  A systematic review on the outcome of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants suffering Robin sequence.

Authors:  Emma C Paes; Aebele B Mink van der Molen; Marvick S M Muradin; Lucienne Speleman; Frea Sloot; Moshe Kon; Corstiaan C Breugem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: Upper Airway Management in Pierre Robin Sequence.

Authors:  Patrick A Newbury; Nicholas S Adams; John A Girotto
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2015-09-04

6.  Stem cell therapy for enhancement of bone consolidation in distraction osteogenesis: A contemporary review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Y Yang; S Lin; B Wang; W Gu; G Li
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  The long-term effects of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on developing deciduous molar teeth.

Authors:  Paul Hong; Elise Graham; James Belyea; S Mark Taylor; Donald B Kearns; Michael Bezuhly
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2012-10-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.