Literature DB >> 21621746

Interpretation bias in Cluster-C and borderline personality disorders.

Arnoud Arntz1, Anoek Weertman, Sjoerd Salet.   

Abstract

Cognitive therapy (CT) assumes that personality disorders (PDs) are characterized by interpretational biases that maintain the disorder. Changing interpretations is therefore a major aim of CT of PDs. This study tested whether Borderline PD (BPD), Avoidant and Dependent PD (AV/DEPD), and Obsessive-Compulsive PD (OCPD) are characterized by specific interpretations. Among the 122 participants there were 55 PD patients (17 BPD, 30 AV/DEPD, 29 OCPD diagnoses), 26 axis-1 patients, and 41 nonpatients. Participants put themselves into 10 scripts of negative events and noted feelings, thoughts and behaviors that came to mind. Next, they chose between hypothesized BPD-specific, AV/DEPD-specific, and OCPD-specific interpretations of each event (forced choice). Lastly, participants rated belief in each interpretation. Regression analyses revealed that forced choices and belief ratings supported the CT-model of BPD and AV/DEP: interpretations were specific. The alleged OCPD-beliefs were however not specifically related to OCPD, with relatively high popularity in axis-1 patients and nonpatients. The open responses were classified by judges blind for diagnoses, with the following results. BPD was characterized by low levels of solution-focused and healthy-flexible/accepting responses, and higher levels of criticizing others and malevolent interpretations of others. AV/DEPD was characterized by lower levels of solution-focused responses, and higher levels of self-criticism, negative emotions, guilt and fear of judgment, as well as lower levels of other-criticism. OCPD only showed trends for lower healthy responses, and higher compulsiveness and worry. It is concluded that the assumptions of CT are supported for BPD and AV/DEPD, but not - at least not on the explicit interpretational level - for OCPD. CT of OCPD might need a slightly different approach.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21621746     DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  6 in total

1.  Personality disorder symptoms are differentially related to divorce frequency.

Authors:  Krystle L Disney; Yana Weinstein; Thomas F Oltmanns
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2012-12

2.  Divergent effects of oxytocin on (para-)limbic reactivity to emotional and neutral scenes in females with and without borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Alexander Lischke; Sabine C Herpertz; Christoph Berger; Gregor Domes; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Childhood trauma and negative memory bias as shared risk factors for psychopathology and comorbidity in a naturalistic psychiatric patient sample.

Authors:  Janna N Vrijsen; Camiel T van Amen; Bauke Koekkoek; Iris van Oostrom; Aart H Schene; Indira Tendolkar
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Neural Basis of Response Bias on the Stop Signal Task in Misophonia.

Authors:  Nadine Eijsker; Arjan Schröder; Dirk J A Smit; Guido van Wingen; Damiaan Denys
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Feeling excluded no matter what? Bias in the processing of social participation in borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Anna Weinbrecht; Michael Niedeggen; Stefan Roepke; Babette Renneberg
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  Emotional reactivity to appraisals in patients with a borderline personality disorder: a daily life study.

Authors:  Marlies Houben; Laurence Claes; Ellen Sleuwaegen; Ann Berens; Kristof Vansteelandt
Journal:  Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul       Date:  2018-11-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.