OBJECTIVE: To gain an overview of approaches, methodologies, and tools used in quality improvement of maternal and newborn health in low-income countries. METHODS: Electronic search of MEDLINE and organizational databases for literature describing approaches, methodologies, and tools used to improve the quality of maternal and newborn health care in low-income countries. Relevant papers and reports were reviewed and summarized. RESULTS: Developing a culture of quality is an important requisite for successful quality improvement. Methodologies to improve quality include the development of standards and guidelines and the performance of mortality, near-miss, and criterion-based audits. Tools for data collection and process description were identified, and examples of work to improve quality of care are provided. CONCLUSION: The documented experience with the identified approaches, methodologies, and tools indicates that none is sufficient by itself to achieve a desirable improvement in quality of care. The choice of methodologies and tools depends on the healthcare system and its available resources. There is a lack of studies that describe the process of quality improvement and a need for research to provide evidence of the effectiveness of the identified methods and tools.
OBJECTIVE: To gain an overview of approaches, methodologies, and tools used in quality improvement of maternal and newborn health in low-income countries. METHODS: Electronic search of MEDLINE and organizational databases for literature describing approaches, methodologies, and tools used to improve the quality of maternal and newborn health care in low-income countries. Relevant papers and reports were reviewed and summarized. RESULTS: Developing a culture of quality is an important requisite for successful quality improvement. Methodologies to improve quality include the development of standards and guidelines and the performance of mortality, near-miss, and criterion-based audits. Tools for data collection and process description were identified, and examples of work to improve quality of care are provided. CONCLUSION: The documented experience with the identified approaches, methodologies, and tools indicates that none is sufficient by itself to achieve a desirable improvement in quality of care. The choice of methodologies and tools depends on the healthcare system and its available resources. There is a lack of studies that describe the process of quality improvement and a need for research to provide evidence of the effectiveness of the identified methods and tools.
Authors: Mary V Kinney; David Roger Walugembe; Phillip Wanduru; Peter Waiswa; Asha George Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Charles Ameh; Sia Msuya; Jan Hofman; Joanna Raven; Matthews Mathai; Nynke van den Broek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gaurav Sharma; Matthews Mathai; Kim E Dickson; Andrew Weeks; G Hofmeyr; Tina Lavender; Louise Day; Jiji Mathews; Sue Fawcus; Aline Simen-Kapeu; Luc de Bernis Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Krishnamurthy Jayanna; Prem Mony; Ramesh B M; Annamma Thomas; Ajay Gaikwad; Mohan H L; James F Blanchard; Stephen Moses; Lisa Avery Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Linda Bartlett; David Cantor; Pamela Lynam; Gurpreet Kaur; Barbara Rawlins; Jim Ricca; Vandana Tripathi; Heather E Rosen Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 9.408