Literature DB >> 21621365

Verbal and non-verbal behavior of doctors and patients in primary care consultations - how this relates to patient enablement.

Teresa Pawlikowska1, Wenjuan Zhang, Frances Griffiths, Jan van Dalen, Cees van der Vleuten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between observable patient and doctor verbal and non-verbal behaviors and the degree of enablement in consultations according to the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) (a patient-reported consultation outcome measure).
METHODS: We analyzed 88 recorded routine primary care consultations. Verbal and non-verbal communications were analyzed using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) and the Medical Interaction Process System, respectively. Consultations were categorized as patient- or doctor-centered and by whether the patient or doctor was verbally dominant using the RIAS categorizations.
RESULTS: Consultations that were regarded as patient-centered or verbally dominated by the patient on RIAS coding were considered enabling. Socio-emotional interchange (agreements, approvals, laughter, legitimization) was associated with enablement. These features, together with task-related behavior explain up to 33% of the variance of enablement, leaving 67% unexplained. Thus, enablement appears to include aspects beyond those expressed as observable behavior.
CONCLUSION: For enablement consultations should be patient-centered and doctors should facilitate socio-emotional interchange. Observable behavior included in communication skills training probably contributes to only about a third of the factors that engender enablement in consultations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: To support patient enablement in consultations, clinicians should focus on agreements, approvals and legitimization whilst attending to patient agendas.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21621365     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  22 in total

1.  Patients respond more positively to physicians who focus on their ideal affect.

Authors:  Tamara Sims; Jeanne L Tsai
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2014-10-13

2.  The development of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview-Fidelity Instrument (CFI-FI): a pilot study.

Authors:  Neil Krishan Aggarwal; Andrew Glass; Amilcar Tirado; Marit Boiler; Andel Nicasio; Margarita Alegría; Melanie Wall; Roberto Lewis-Fernández
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-08

3.  Periodic health examinations and missed opportunities among patients likely needing mental health care.

Authors:  Ming Tai-Seale; Laura A Hatfield; Caroline J Wilson; Cheryl D Stults; Thomas G McGuire; Lisa C Diamond; Richard M Frankel; Lisa MacLean; Ashley Stone; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Supporting Patient Behavior Change: Approaches Used by Primary Care Clinicians Whose Patients Have an Increase in Activation Levels.

Authors:  Jessica Greene; Judith H Hibbard; Carmen Alvarez; Valerie Overton
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  From qualitative data to GP training on CRC screening.

Authors:  Isabelle Aubin-Auger; Alain Mercier; Josselin Le Bel; Katrien Bombeke; Dan Baruch; Anne Youssefian; Jean Pierre Lebeau; Tu Le Trung; Lieve Peremans; Paul Van Royen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  The impact of peer mentor communication with older adults on depressive symptoms and working alliance: A pilot study.

Authors:  Jin Hui Joo; Seungyoung Hwang; Joseph J Gallo; Debra L Roter
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-10-20

7.  Reliability and applicability of the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) in a Swedish general practice setting.

Authors:  Mattias Rööst; Andrzej Zielinski; Christer Petersson; Eva Lena Strandberg
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  What do older people value when they visit their general practitioner? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Ludmila Marcinowicz; Teresa Pawlikowska; Marek Oleszczyk
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2014

9.  Face-to-face vs telephone pre-colonoscopy consultation in colorectal cancer screening; a randomised trial.

Authors:  E M Stoop; T R de Wijkerslooth; P M Bossuyt; J Stoker; P Fockens; E J Kuipers; E Dekker; M E van Leerdam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  New insight into the role of patients during medical appointments: a synthesis of three qualitative studies.

Authors:  Ludmila Marcinowicz; Teresa Pawlikowska; Jerzy Konstantynowicz; Slawomir Chlabicz
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.