Literature DB >> 21621222

Quality of life of adolescent kidney transplant recipients.

Allison Tong1, Lidwien Tjaden, Kirsten Howard, Germaine Wong, Rachael Morton, Jonathan C Craig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To elicit utility-based quality of life (QOL) of adolescent kidney transplant recipients. STUDY
DESIGN: We measured QOL in adolescent transplant recipients by using a visual analog scale (VAS), and 2 utility-based QOL measures, the Health Utilities Index (HUI) Mark 2/3 (HUI2/3), and the time trade-off. Participants aged 11-19 years old were recruited from 5 transplantation centers in Australia. Mean scores were compared by using paired t tests, and linear multiple regression was used to define predictors for time trade-off QOL weights.
RESULTS: Twenty-six adolescents participated in the study. On a scale with extremes of 0 (death) and 1 (full health), the participants had a mean (SD) time trade-off QOL weight of 0.99 ± 0.01 and HUI2/3 utility scores of 0.86 ± 0.16 and 0.85 ± 0.21, respectively. Time trade-off values were significantly higher than HUI Mark 2 values (P = .01) and HUI Mark 3 values (P = .02). From the HUI measure, decrements were observed in specific QOL domains, including vision, emotion (depression and anxiety), cognition, and pain.
CONCLUSION: Adolescent kidney transplant recipients had consistent and high values for their current QOL, which suggests that they perceive themselves to be close to full health. However, adequate emotional and cognitive support may improve their overall QOL.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21621222     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  8 in total

Review 1.  A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Exploring the Issues of Valuing Child and Adolescent Health States Using a Mixed Sample of Adolescents and Adults.

Authors:  Donna Rowen; Clara Mukuria; Philip A Powell; Allan Wailoo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Utility of continuous performance test (MOXO-CPT) in children with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease, dialysis and kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Sevcan A Bakkaloğlu; Bahar Büyükkaragöz; A Şebnem Soysal Acar; Mesiha Ekim; Umut Selda Bayrakçı; Mehmet Bülbül; Aysun Çaltık Yılmaz
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 4.393

4.  Preference Elicitation Techniques Used in Valuing Children's Health-Related Quality-of-Life: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cate Bailey; Martin Howell; Kirsten Howard; Rosalie Viney; Rakhee Raghunandan; Amber Salisbury; Gang Chen; Joanna Coast; Jonathan C Craig; Nancy J Devlin; Elisabeth Huynh; Emily Lancsar; Brendan J Mulhern; Richard Norman; Stavros Petrou; Julie Ratcliffe; Deborah J Street
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.558

Review 5.  Health-related quality of life in patients with pediatric onset of end-stage renal disease: state of the art and recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Lidwien A Tjaden; Martha A Grootenhuis; Marlies Noordzij; Jaap W Groothoff
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Perspectives on life participation by young adults with chronic kidney disease: an interview study.

Authors:  Jasmijn Kerklaan; Elyssa Hannan; Camilla Hanson; Chandana Guha; Yeoungjee Cho; Martin Christian; Lorraine Hamiwka; Jessica Ryan; Aditi Sinha; Germaine Wong; Jonathan Craig; Jaap Groothoff; Allison Tong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Standardised Outcomes in Nephrology-Children and Adolescents (SONG-Kids): a protocol for establishing a core outcome set for children with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Susan Samuel; Michael Zappitelli; Allison Dart; Susan Furth; Allison Eddy; Jaap Groothoff; Nicholas J A Webb; Hui-Kim Yap; Detlef Bockenhauer; Aditi Sinha; Stephen I Alexander; Stuart L Goldstein; Debbie S Gipson; Camilla S Hanson; Nicole Evangelidis; Sally Crowe; Tess Harris; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Braden Manns; John Gill; Peter Tugwell; Wim Van Biesen; David C Wheeler; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Piloting Psychology Annual Reviews as a Method of Measuring Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in Paediatric Renal Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Jade Bamford; Lucy Wirz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.