Literature DB >> 21620553

Comparison of re-operation rates and complication rates after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopy-assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH).

Alexander Boosz1, Johannes Lermann, Grit Mehlhorn, Christian Loehberg, Stefan P Renner, Falk C Thiel, Michael Schrauder, Matthias W Beckmann, Andreas Mueller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare re-operation rates and complication rates after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopy-assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 867 women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy between January 2002 and December 2009 for benign gynaecological diseases. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed in 567 women (TLH group) and laparoscopy-assisted supracervical hysterectomy was performed in 300 women (LASH group).
RESULTS: The women in the LASH group were significantly younger (45.6 years) than those in the TLH group (47.9 years) and the uteri removed with LASH were significantly heavier (326.4 g) than those removed with TLH (242.7 g). The rate of salpingo-oophorectomy was significantly lower in the LASH group. The overall re-operation rates were equivalent in the two groups. Two method-specific reasons for re-operations were identified. A method-specific procedure after LASH was extirpation of the cervical stump, which was performed in 2.7% of the women. Vaginal cuff dehiscence was a method-specific problem leading to secondary operation after TLH and was observed in 0.7% of the patients. No differences between the intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were observed, although there was a trend toward lower complication rates after LASH.
CONCLUSIONS: There seem to be equivalent overall re-operation rates and complication rates after both hysterectomy procedures, making the two laparoscopic approaches for hysterectomy equivalent.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21620553     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  4 in total

1.  Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar SupraLoop™ Electrode versus Monopolar Needle in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy (LSH): An Interventional, Comparative Cohort Study.

Authors:  S Brucker; R Rothmund; B Krämer; F Neis; B Schönfisch; W Zubke; F A Taran; M Wallwiener
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 2.  The conservative and interventional treatment of fibroids.

Authors:  Alexander Stephan Boosz; Peter Reimer; Matthias Matzko; Thomas Römer; Andreas Müller
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy in Patients with Very Large Uteri: a Retrospective Single-Center Experience at a Major University Hospital.

Authors:  Dorit Schöller; Florin-Andrei Taran; Markus Wallwiener; Birgitt Schönfisch; Bernhard Krämer; Harald Abele; Felix Neis; Christian W Wallwiener; Sara Brucker
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Single-Surgeon Experience of Initial 50 Cases.

Authors:  Sana Ashfaq; Mubashra Samina; Maria Jabeen; Shaheen Zafar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-01-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.