BACKGROUND: Phrenic pacing is an alternative to positive-pressure ventilation in selected patients, mostly in cases of upper spinal cord injury. We evaluated results of phrenic pacing performed by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). METHOD: Between 1997 and 2007, after complete neuromuscular investigations, 20 patients requiring full-time ventilation were selected for phrenic pacing (19 with posttraumatic tetraplegia and 1 with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome). Quadripolar cuff electrodes were fixed around each intrathoracic phrenic nerve via bilateral VATS. They were connected to a subcutaneous radiofrequency receiver coupled to an external radiofrequency transmitter. All patients participated in a reconditioning program beginning 2 weeks after implantation and continued until ventilatory weaning. RESULTS: Phrenic pacing was successful in all cases. No intraoperative complications or perioperative mortality were observed. Intraoperative testing detected stimulation thresholds in 19 patients (range, 0.05-2.9 mA). Ventilatory weaning was obtained in 18 patients. Median diaphragm reconditioning time was 6 weeks (2 weeks-11 months). Reconditioning was still in process in a young woman and was not achieved in an elderly woman with a 4-year history of tetraplegia. All the patients weaned from mechanical ventilation reported improved quality of life. Failure or delay in recovery of effective diaphragm contraction was due to nonreversible amyotrophy. CONCLUSIONS: VATS implantation of 4-pole electrodes around the intrathoracic phrenic nerve is a safe procedure. Ventilatory weaning correlates with the degree of diaphragmatic amyotrophy. Phrenic pacing, performed as soon as neurologic and orthopedic stabilization is achieved, is the most important prognostic factor for successful weaning.
BACKGROUND: Phrenic pacing is an alternative to positive-pressure ventilation in selected patients, mostly in cases of upper spinal cord injury. We evaluated results of phrenic pacing performed by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). METHOD: Between 1997 and 2007, after complete neuromuscular investigations, 20 patients requiring full-time ventilation were selected for phrenic pacing (19 with posttraumatic tetraplegia and 1 with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome). Quadripolar cuff electrodes were fixed around each intrathoracic phrenic nerve via bilateral VATS. They were connected to a subcutaneous radiofrequency receiver coupled to an external radiofrequency transmitter. All patients participated in a reconditioning program beginning 2 weeks after implantation and continued until ventilatory weaning. RESULTS: Phrenic pacing was successful in all cases. No intraoperative complications or perioperative mortality were observed. Intraoperative testing detected stimulation thresholds in 19 patients (range, 0.05-2.9 mA). Ventilatory weaning was obtained in 18 patients. Median diaphragm reconditioning time was 6 weeks (2 weeks-11 months). Reconditioning was still in process in a young woman and was not achieved in an elderly woman with a 4-year history of tetraplegia. All the patients weaned from mechanical ventilation reported improved quality of life. Failure or delay in recovery of effective diaphragm contraction was due to nonreversible amyotrophy. CONCLUSIONS: VATS implantation of 4-pole electrodes around the intrathoracic phrenic nerve is a safe procedure. Ventilatory weaning correlates with the degree of diaphragmatic amyotrophy. Phrenic pacing, performed as soon as neurologic and orthopedic stabilization is achieved, is the most important prognostic factor for successful weaning.
Authors: E Stanley; J Broderick; K Synnott; J McCarthy; E Smith; V Reid; F Colreavy; E Carton Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2013-08-08 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Darcy Ribeiro Filho Pinto; Miguel Lia Tedde; Alexandre José Gonçalves Avino; Suzan Lúcia Brancher Brandão; Iuri Zanatta; Rafael Hahn Journal: J Bras Pneumol Date: 2015 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.624
Authors: Marat Fudim; Andrew R Spector; Maria-Rosa Costanzo; Sean D Pokorney; Robert J Mentz; Dariusz Jagielski; Ralph Augostini; William T Abraham; Piotr P Ponikowski; Scott W McKane; Jonathan P Piccini Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-11-05 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Ha Trang; Jean-François Brunet; Hermann Rohrer; Jorge Gallego; Jeanne Amiel; Tiziana Bachetti; Kenneth H Fischbeck; Thomas Similowski; Christian Straus; Isabella Ceccherini; Debra E Weese-Mayer; Matthias Frerick; Katarzyna Bieganowska; Linda Middleton; Francesco Morandi; Giancarlo Ottonello Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: Eric Verin; Capucine Morelot-Panzini; Jesus Gonzalez-Bermejo; Benoit Veber; Brigitte Perrouin Verbe; Brigitte Soudrie; Anne Marie Leroi; Jean Paul Marie; Thomas Similowski Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2017-11-20