Literature DB >> 21620316

Moving SDM forward in Canada: milestones, public involvement, and barriers that remain.

France Légaré1, Dawn Stacey, Pierre-Gerlier Forest, Marie-France Coutu.   

Abstract

Canada's approach to shared decision making (SDM) is as disparate as its healthcare system; a conglomerate of 14 public plans at various administrative levels. SDM initiatives are taking place in different pockets of the country and are in different stages of development. The most advanced provincial initiative is occurring in Saskatchewan, where in 2010 the provincial government prepare to introduce patient decision aids into certain surgical specialties. With regard to decision support tools for patients, perhaps the most active entity is the Patient Decision Aids Research Group in Ottawa, Ontario. This group maintains a public inventory of decision aids ranked according to International Patient Decision Aid Standards and has developed the generic Ottawa Personal Decision Guide, as well as a toolkit for integrating decision aids in clinical practice. All of these tools are publicly available free of charge. Professional interest in SDM in Canada is not yet widespread, but Canada's principal health research funding agency is sponsoring several important SDM projects. Researchers from institutions across the country are promoting SDM through continuing professional development programs and other interventions in fields as varied as primary care, dietary medicine and workplace rehabilitation. Still, the future of SDM in Canada remains uncertain. Canada's provincially based structure obliges promoters to work with each province separately, and the recent growth of private healthcare risks dissipating efforts to implement SDM. 2011. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21620316     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  9 in total

1.  The importance of measuring strength-of-preference scores for health care options in preference-sensitive care.

Authors:  R Trafford Crump; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.

Authors:  Isabelle Scholl; Levente Kriston; Jörg Dirmaier; Martin Härter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Key concepts in consumer and community engagement: a scoping meta-review.

Authors:  Pooria Sarrami-Foroushani; Joanne Travaglia; Deborah Debono; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Implementing strategies in consumer and community engagement in health care: results of a large-scale, scoping meta-review.

Authors:  Pooria Sarrami-Foroushani; Joanne Travaglia; Deborah Debono; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Use of the Diabetes Medication Choice Decision Aid in patients with type 2 diabetes in Greece: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Thomas Karagiannis; Aris Liakos; Megan E Branda; Eleni Athanasiadou; Maria Mainou; Panagiota Boura; Dimitrios G Goulis; Annie LeBlanc; Victor M Montori; Apostolos Tsapas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Assessing medical student knowledge and attitudes about shared decision making across the curriculum: protocol for an international online survey and stakeholder analysis.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Renata Yen; Paul J Barr; Nan Cochran; Johanna Aarts; France Légaré; Malcolm Reed; A James O'Malley; Peter Scalia; Geneviève Painchaud Guérard; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Investigation of factors influencing the implementation of two shared decision-making interventions in contraceptive care: a qualitative interview study among clinical and administrative staff.

Authors:  Sarah Munro; Ruth Manski; Kyla Z Donnelly; Daniela Agusti; Gabrielle Stevens; Michelle Banach; Maureen B Boardman; Pearl Brady; Chrissy Colón Bradt; Tina Foster; Deborah J Johnson; Judy Norsigian; Melissa Nothnagle; Heather L Shepherd; Lisa Stern; Lyndal Trevena; Glyn Elwyn; Rachel Thompson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Shared decision-making: the perspectives of young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Janice Wiley; Mary Westbrook; Jerry R Greenfield; Richard O Day; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 9.  "Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Isabelle Scholl; Caroline Tietbohl; Mala Mann; Adrian G K Edwards; Catharine Clay; France Légaré; Trudy van der Weijden; Carmen L Lewis; Richard M Wexler; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.