OBJECTIVES: To identify the risk factors for ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation and to evaluate their impact on both graft and patient survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 789 kidney transplants among 782 patients performed at our institution between 1995 and 2007. The parameters studied included the characteristics of the donor, recipient and transplant, the surgical variables, the elements of the monitoring process and a graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The ureteral stenosis rate after renal transplantation was found to be 6.5%, and the ureterovesical junction was the most common location (68%). A univariate analysis showed that this complication was significantly associated with a higher donor age (P=0.01), abnormal graft revascularisation (P=0.032) and DGF (Delay Graft Function) (P=0.05). In multivariate analysis, only donor age (P=0.001) and abnormal graft revascularisation (P=0.035) were independent risk factors for ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation. When ureteral stenosis was treated, an analysis of the survival curves according to the Kaplan-Meier method did not reveal significant differences either in graft survival (P=0.518) or overall survival of the patients (P=0.614) as compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, donor age and abnormal graft revascularisation were independent risk factors for ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation. This result is a strong argument for an ischemic component in the genesis of ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation, which should help to identify patients at risk.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the risk factors for ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation and to evaluate their impact on both graft and patient survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 789 kidney transplants among 782 patients performed at our institution between 1995 and 2007. The parameters studied included the characteristics of the donor, recipient and transplant, the surgical variables, the elements of the monitoring process and a graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The ureteral stenosis rate after renal transplantation was found to be 6.5%, and the ureterovesical junction was the most common location (68%). A univariate analysis showed that this complication was significantly associated with a higher donor age (P=0.01), abnormal graft revascularisation (P=0.032) and DGF (Delay Graft Function) (P=0.05). In multivariate analysis, only donor age (P=0.001) and abnormal graft revascularisation (P=0.035) were independent risk factors for ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation. When ureteral stenosis was treated, an analysis of the survival curves according to the Kaplan-Meier method did not reveal significant differences either in graft survival (P=0.518) or overall survival of the patients (P=0.614) as compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, donor age and abnormal graft revascularisation were independent risk factors for ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation. This result is a strong argument for an ischemic component in the genesis of ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation, which should help to identify patients at risk.