Literature DB >> 21618559

SDOCK: a global protein-protein docking program using stepwise force-field potentials.

Changsheng Zhang1, Luhua Lai.   

Abstract

Fast Fourier transform (FFT) method limits the forms of scoring functions in global protein-protein docking. On the other hand, force field potentials can effectively describe the energy hyper surface of biological macromolecules. In this study, we developed a new protein-protein docking program, SDOCK, that incorporates van der Waals attractive potential, geometric collision, screened electrostatic potential, and Lazaridis-Karplus desolvation energy into the scoring function in the global searching process. Stepwise potentials were generated from the corresponding continuous forms to treat the structure flexibility. After optimization of the atom solvation parameters and the weights of different potential terms based on a new docking test set that contains 142 cases with small or moderate conformational changes upon binding, SDOCK slightly outperformed the well-known FFT based global docking program ZDOCK3.0. Among the 142 cases tested, 52.8% gave at least one near-native solutions in the top 100 solutions. SDOCK was also tested on six blind testing cases in Critical Assessment of Predicted Interactions rounds 13 to 18. In all six cases, the near-native solutions could be found within the top 350 solutions. Because the SDOCK approach performs global docking based on force-field potentials, one of its advantages is that it provides global binding free energy surface profiles for further analysis. The efficiency of the program is also comparable with that of other FFT based protein-protein docking programs. SDOCK is available for noncommercial applications at http://mdl.ipc.pku.edu.cn/cgi-bin/down.cgi.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21618559     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  8 in total

Review 1.  Software for molecular docking: a review.

Authors:  Nataraj S Pagadala; Khajamohiddin Syed; Jack Tuszynski
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-01-16

Review 2.  What method to use for protein-protein docking?

Authors:  Kathryn A Porter; Israel Desta; Dima Kozakov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Determination of an effective scoring function for RNA-RNA interactions with a physics-based double-iterative method.

Authors:  Yumeng Yan; Zeyu Wen; Di Zhang; Sheng-You Huang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Protein-Protein Docking: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Sharon Sunny; P B Jayaraj
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.371

5.  IRaPPA: information retrieval based integration of biophysical models for protein assembly selection.

Authors:  Iain H Moal; Didier Barradas-Bautista; Brian Jiménez-García; Mieczyslaw Torchala; Arjan van der Velde; Thom Vreven; Zhiping Weng; Paul A Bates; Juan Fernández-Recio
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Docking-based modeling of protein-protein interfaces for extensive structural and functional characterization of missense mutations.

Authors:  Didier Barradas-Bautista; Juan Fernández-Recio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  MEGADOCK-Web: an integrated database of high-throughput structure-based protein-protein interaction predictions.

Authors:  Takanori Hayashi; Yuri Matsuzaki; Keisuke Yanagisawa; Masahito Ohue; Yutaka Akiyama
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Network-based protein-protein interaction prediction method maps perturbations of cancer interactome.

Authors:  Jiajun Qiu; Kui Chen; Chunlong Zhong; Sihao Zhu; Xiao Ma
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 5.917

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.