| Literature DB >> 21617780 |
Elisabeth Fritz1, Johannes Saukel.
Abstract
Numerous species of the Asteraceae, the composites, are famous for their use in both traditional and conventional medicine. Reliable anatomical descriptions of these plants and of possible adulterations provide a basis for fast identification and cheap purity controls of respective medicinal drugs by means of light microscopy. Nevertheless, detailed comparative studies on root and rhizome anatomy of valuable as well as related inconsiderable composite plants are largely missing yet. The presented study aims to narrow this gap by performing anatomical analyses of roots and rhizomes of 16 species belonging to the tribe Cardueae, of formerly and currently used drugs as well as their near relatives as potential adulterations (Carlina acaulis L., Carlina vulgaris L., Arctium lappa L., Arctium tomentosum Mill., Carduus defloratus L., Carduus personata (L.) Jacq, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten., Cirsium erisithales (Jacq.) Scop., Onopordum acanthium L., Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn., Rhaponticum scariosum Lam., Centaurea jacea L., Centaurea scabiosa L., Centaurea cyanus L., Cnicus benedictus L.). A detailed verbal and graphical survey of the analysed anatomical features is provided. Several characters were finally extracted which allow for discrimination of the examined species and may be effectively used for drug quality controls.Entities:
Keywords: Asteraceae; Microscopy; Plant anatomy; Root anatomy
Year: 2010 PMID: 21617780 PMCID: PMC3097509 DOI: 10.3797/scipharm.1010-05
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Pharm ISSN: 0036-8709
Fig. 1.Secretory duct in longitudinal section build from two adjacent layers of cells differing in length. The quotient C1:C2 is used to discriminate between three types of secretory ducts (fig. cited: [12]).
Fig. 7.Cirsium arvense root: sclereids (as an important discriminative character) developed within the cortex; a: longitudinal section; b: transverse sections; scale bars are 50 μm
Fig. 8.Schematic view of Carduus sp. and Cirsium sp. (transverse section): small ellipses mark the position of the enodermal resin ducts (endoSDs) of the cortex and the ducts of type SD2, black points represent the sclereids
a: Carduus defloratus:
Secondary root: sclereids in cortex and sec. phloem, endoSDs lost together with the cortex in course of rhytidome formation; SDs besides endoSDs missing;
b: Carduus personata:
Rhizome with secondary growth: sclereids in cortex, secondary phloem and as transition between vascular bundles and pith; endoSDs or remnants of them visible; SDs besides endoSDs missing;
c,d: Cirsium arvense:
allorhizous: taproot with long part of rhizome; stoloniferous plant – spreading building rhizomes;
Secondary root (c): sclereids in cortex (large intercellular spaces – aerenchyma) and secondary phloem; endoSDs regularly arranged; SDs besides endoSDs missing;
Rhizome with secondary growth (d): sclereids in cortex and secondary phloem; endoSDs lost lost together with the suberizing of the cortex; SDs at the border between vascular bundle and pith;
e: Cirsium erisithales:
Rhizome with secondary growth: endoSDs lost together with the cortex due to rhytidome formation; sclereids missing; SDs besides the endoSDs missing;
f: Cirsium vulgare:
Secondary root: sclereids in cortex and secondary phloem; endoSDs lost together with the cortex due to rhytidome formation; SDs beside endoSDs missing;
Fig. 9.Schematic view of the various roots studied: small ellipses mark the position of the endodermal resin ducts of the cortex and the ducts of type SD2; a: black points represent the sclereids in conjunction with secretory ducts (grey dots), b: points represent the vessels (b); a: Centaurea jacea; b: Arctium lappa, A. tomentosum; c: Onopordum acanthium, Silybum marianum, Cnicus benedictus; d: Centaurea scabiosa; e: Carlina acaulis; f: Rhaponticum scariosum; g: Carlina vulgaris, Centaurea cyanus;
Fig. 10.Key of the subterranean organs of the species examined in this study; * Data concerning R. carthamoides is based on Łotocka & Geszprych [27]
List of species examined in this study (accessions are taxonomically arranged following the current systematic concept provided in [31]); AUT: Austria, GER: Germany, ITA: Italy, POL: Poland, SLK: Slovakia, LIE: Liechtenstein; Plant material collected by Elisabeth Fritz (EF), Christoph Dobeš (CD), Silvia Fialova (SF), Werner Lahner (WL), Günther Stadler (GS)
| AUT, Vienna, EF | ||
| C. vulgaris L. | POL, Gutkowo / Olsztyn, EF | |
|
| ||
| AUT, Vienna, Donauinsel, EF | ||
| -, Lower Austria, Traiskirchen, EF | ||
|
| ||
| -, Lower Austria, Gippel, CD | ||
| -, Lower Austria, Araburg, EF | ||
| -, Styria, Schneealpe, EF | ||
|
| ||
| SLK, Modra, Tochova Chata, SF | ||
| AUT, Vienna, EF | ||
| POL, Gutkowo / Olsztyn, EF | ||
| AUT, Styria, Schneealpe, EF | ||
|
| ||
| AUT, Lower Austria, Buchberg, WL | ||
| ITA, Southern Tyrol, Vinschgau, CD | ||
|
| ||
| AUT, Lower Austria, Buchberg, EL | ||
| Gaertn. | SLK, Bratislava, Botanical Garden, SF | |
|
| ||
| LIE, GS | ||
|
| ||
| Austria, Karnabrunn, CD | ||
| -, Vienna, EF | ||
| -, Vienna, JS | ||
| Poland, Gutkowo, Olsztyn, EF | ||
| Switzerland, Graubünden, Lavin, CD | ||
| Austria, Vienna, EF | ||
| Germany, Baden-Württemberg, Kronau, CD | ||
| Poland, Mazury, Zabie, EF | ||
|
| ||
| Botanical Garden of the Department of | ||
| Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna | ||