Literature DB >> 21617077

Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study.

Michele J Gelfand1, Jana L Raver, Lisa Nishii, Lisa M Leslie, Janetta Lun, Beng Chong Lim, Lili Duan, Assaf Almaliach, Soon Ang, Jakobina Arnadottir, Zeynep Aycan, Klaus Boehnke, Pawel Boski, Rosa Cabecinhas, Darius Chan, Jagdeep Chhokar, Alessia D'Amato, Montse Ferrer, Iris C Fischlmayr, Ronald Fischer, Marta Fülöp, James Georgas, Emiko S Kashima, Yoshishima Kashima, Kibum Kim, Alain Lempereur, Patricia Marquez, Rozhan Othman, Bert Overlaet, Penny Panagiotopoulou, Karl Peltzer, Lorena R Perez-Florizno, Larisa Ponomarenko, Anu Realo, Vidar Schei, Manfred Schmitt, Peter B Smith, Nazar Soomro, Erna Szabo, Nalinee Taveesin, Midori Toyama, Evert Van de Vliert, Naharika Vohra, Colleen Ward, Susumu Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

With data from 33 nations, we illustrate the differences between cultures that are tight (have many strong norms and a low tolerance of deviant behavior) versus loose (have weak social norms and a high tolerance of deviant behavior). Tightness-looseness is part of a complex, loosely integrated multilevel system that comprises distal ecological and historical threats (e.g., high population density, resource scarcity, a history of territorial conflict, and disease and environmental threats), broad versus narrow socialization in societal institutions (e.g., autocracy, media regulations), the strength of everyday recurring situations, and micro-level psychological affordances (e.g., prevention self-guides, high regulatory strength, need for structure). This research advances knowledge that can foster cross-cultural understanding in a world of increasing global interdependence and has implications for modeling cultural change.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21617077     DOI: 10.1126/science.1197754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  215 in total

1.  Collapse, environment, and society.

Authors:  Karl W Butzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Is Conscientiousness Always Associated With Better Health? A U.S.-Japan Cross-Cultural Examination of Biological Health Risk.

Authors:  Shinobu Kitayama; Jiyoung Park
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2020-06-18

Review 3.  Emotion and biological health: the socio-cultural moderation.

Authors:  Shinobu Kitayama; Jiyoung Park
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2017-07-05

4.  Heterogeneity of long-history migration explains cultural differences in reports of emotional expressivity and the functions of smiles.

Authors:  Magdalena Rychlowska; Yuri Miyamoto; David Matsumoto; Ursula Hess; Eva Gilboa-Schechtman; Shanmukh Kamble; Hamdi Muluk; Takahiko Masuda; Paula Marie Niedenthal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Hierarchical cultural values predict success and mortality in high-stakes teams.

Authors:  Eric M Anicich; Roderick I Swaab; Adam D Galinsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Universal and culture-specific patterns of tightness-looseness across the 31 Chinese provinces.

Authors:  Michele J Gelfand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Toward a science of delivering aid with dignity: Experimental evidence and local forecasts from Kenya.

Authors:  Catherine C Thomas; Nicholas G Otis; Justin R Abraham; Hazel Rose Markus; Gregory M Walton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Collectivism predicts mask use during COVID-19.

Authors:  Jackson G Lu; Peter Jin; Alexander S English
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Pathogen prevalence, group bias, and collectivism in the standard cross-cultural sample.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cashdan; Matthew Steele
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-03

10.  Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries.

Authors:  Mohammad Atari; Mark H C Lai; Morteza Dehghani
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.