OBJECTIVE: There is increasing evidence that schizophrenia patients have difficulties in the hedonic appraisal of odors. In a prior study, we assessed olfactory hedonic perception birhinally and found that males with schizophrenia failed to attach the appropriate hedonic valence to a pleasant odor, despite correctly perceiving changes in odor intensity. Female patients, in contrast, exhibited normal responses. The current study extends this work by examining odor valence processing in unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients, to determine the extent to which this abnormality may be genetically mediated. We also examine odor valence processing unirhinally, rather than birhinally, to probe possible lateralized differences in patients' hedonic processing deficits. METHOD: Individuals with schizophrenia (n = 54), first-degree unaffected family members (n = 22), and demographically matched controls (n = 45) were administered the Suprathreshold Amyl Acetate Odor Intensity and Odor Pleasantness Rating Test. RESULTS: In contrast to family members and controls, both male and female schizophrenia probands underevaluated the hedonic characteristics of amyl acetate at lower concentrations and overevaluated its pleasantness at concentrations perceived as unpleasant by both controls and relatives. These patient-specific differences could not be explained by differences in smoking habit, medication use, or subjective ratings of odor intensity. However, they were associated with increased levels of anhedonia/asociality and negative symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that both male and female schizophrenia patients have difficulties in the unirhinal appraisal of hedonic valence. Normal responses in unaffected first-degree relatives suggest that this is an environmentally, rather than genetically, mediated abnormality denoting negative symptomatology.
OBJECTIVE: There is increasing evidence that schizophreniapatients have difficulties in the hedonic appraisal of odors. In a prior study, we assessed olfactory hedonic perception birhinally and found that males with schizophrenia failed to attach the appropriate hedonic valence to a pleasant odor, despite correctly perceiving changes in odor intensity. Female patients, in contrast, exhibited normal responses. The current study extends this work by examining odor valence processing in unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophreniapatients, to determine the extent to which this abnormality may be genetically mediated. We also examine odor valence processing unirhinally, rather than birhinally, to probe possible lateralized differences in patients' hedonic processing deficits. METHOD: Individuals with schizophrenia (n = 54), first-degree unaffected family members (n = 22), and demographically matched controls (n = 45) were administered the Suprathreshold Amyl Acetate Odor Intensity and Odor Pleasantness Rating Test. RESULTS: In contrast to family members and controls, both male and female schizophrenia probands underevaluated the hedonic characteristics of amyl acetate at lower concentrations and overevaluated its pleasantness at concentrations perceived as unpleasant by both controls and relatives. These patient-specific differences could not be explained by differences in smoking habit, medication use, or subjective ratings of odor intensity. However, they were associated with increased levels of anhedonia/asociality and negative symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that both male and female schizophreniapatients have difficulties in the unirhinal appraisal of hedonic valence. Normal responses in unaffected first-degree relatives suggest that this is an environmentally, rather than genetically, mediated abnormality denoting negative symptomatology.
Authors: B Crespo-Facorro; S Paradiso; N C Andreasen; D S O'Leary; G L Watkins; L L Ponto; R D Hichwa Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-07-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Dolores Malaspina; Eliza Coleman; Raymond R Goetz; Jill Harkavy-Friedman; Cheryl Corcoran; Xavier Amador; Scott Yale; Jack M Gorman Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2002-05-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Franck Schürhoff; Andrei Szöke; Frank Bellivier; Cristina Turcas; Michelle Villemur; Jean Tignol; Frédéric Rouillon; Marion Leboyer Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2003-05-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Paul J Moberg; Steven E Arnold; Richard L Doty; Christian Kohler; Stephen Kanes; Steven Seigel; Raquel E Gur; Bruce I Turetsky Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Mary R Lee; Heidi J Wehring; Robert P McMahon; Jared Linthicum; Nicola Cascella; Fang Liu; Alan Bellack; Robert W Buchanan; Gregory P Strauss; Carlo Contoreggi; Deanna L Kelly Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Vidyulata Kamath; Bruce I Turetsky; Monica E Calkins; Warren B Bilker; Nathan Frishberg; Karin Borgmann-Winter; Christian G Kohler; Catherine G Conroy; Raquel E Gur; Paul J Moberg Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Julie Walsh-Messinger; Philip S Wong; Daniel Antonius; Kevin McMahon; Lewis A Opler; Paul Michael Ramirez; Dolores Malaspina Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Chijioke N Egbujo; Duncan Sinclair; Karin E Borgmann-Winter; Steven E Arnold; Bruce I Turetsky; Chang-Gyu Hahn Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 4.939