PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The Frullania tamarisci complex includes eight Holarctic liverwort species. One of these, F. asagrayana, is distributed broadly throughout eastern North America from Canada to the Gulf Coast. Preliminary genetic data suggested that the species includes two groups of populations. This study was designed to test whether the two groups are reproductively isolated biological species. • METHODS: Eighty-eight samples from across the range of F. asagrayana, plus 73 samples from one population, were genotyped for 13 microsatellite loci. Sequences for two plastid loci and nrITS were obtained from 13 accessions. Genetic data were analyzed using coalescent models and Bayesian inference. • KEY RESULTS: Frullania asagrayana is sequence-invariant at the two plastid loci and ITS2, but two clear groups were resolved by microsatellites. The two groups are largely reproductively isolated, but there is a low level of gene flow from the southern to the northern group. No gene flow was detected in the other direction. A local population was heterogeneous but displayed strong genetic structure. • CONCLUSIONS: The genetic structure of F. asagrayana in eastern North America reflects morphologically cryptic differentiation between reproductively isolated groups of populations, near-panmixis within groups, and clonal propagation at local scales. Reproductive isolation between groups that are invariant at the level of nucleotide sequences shows that caution must be exercised in making taxonomic and evolutionary inferences from reciprocal monophyly (or lack thereof) between putative species.
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: The Frullania tamarisci complex includes eight Holarctic liverwort species. One of these, F. asagrayana, is distributed broadly throughout eastern North America from Canada to the Gulf Coast. Preliminary genetic data suggested that the species includes two groups of populations. This study was designed to test whether the two groups are reproductively isolated biological species. • METHODS: Eighty-eight samples from across the range of F. asagrayana, plus 73 samples from one population, were genotyped for 13 microsatellite loci. Sequences for two plastid loci and nrITS were obtained from 13 accessions. Genetic data were analyzed using coalescent models and Bayesian inference. • KEY RESULTS:Frullania asagrayana is sequence-invariant at the two plastid loci and ITS2, but two clear groups were resolved by microsatellites. The two groups are largely reproductively isolated, but there is a low level of gene flow from the southern to the northern group. No gene flow was detected in the other direction. A local population was heterogeneous but displayed strong genetic structure. • CONCLUSIONS: The genetic structure of F. asagrayana in eastern North America reflects morphologically cryptic differentiation between reproductively isolated groups of populations, near-panmixis within groups, and clonal propagation at local scales. Reproductive isolation between groups that are invariant at the level of nucleotide sequences shows that caution must be exercised in making taxonomic and evolutionary inferences from reciprocal monophyly (or lack thereof) between putative species.
Authors: Lars Söderström; Anders Hagborg; Matt von Konrat; Sharon Bartholomew-Began; David Bell; Laura Briscoe; Elizabeth Brown; D Christine Cargill; Denise P Costa; Barbara J Crandall-Stotler; Endymion D Cooper; Gregorio Dauphin; John J Engel; Kathrin Feldberg; David Glenny; S Robbert Gradstein; Xiaolan He; Jochen Heinrichs; Jörn Hentschel; Anna Luiza Ilkiu-Borges; Tomoyuki Katagiri; Nadezhda A Konstantinova; Juan Larraín; David G Long; Martin Nebel; Tamás Pócs; Felisa Puche; Elena Reiner-Drehwald; Matt A M Renner; Andrea Sass-Gyarmati; Alfons Schäfer-Verwimp; José Gabriel Segarra Moragues; Raymond E Stotler; Phiangphak Sukkharak; Barbara M Thiers; Jaime Uribe; Jiří Váňa; Juan Carlos Villarreal; Martin Wigginton; Li Zhang; Rui-Liang Zhu Journal: PhytoKeys Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 1.635
Authors: Matt A M Renner; Nicolas Devos; Jairo Patiño; Elizabeth A Brown; Andrew Orme; Michael Elgey; Trevor C Wilson; Lindsey J Gray; Matt J von Konrat Journal: PhytoKeys Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 1.635
Authors: Matt von Konrat; Peter de Lange; Matt Greif; Lynika Strozier; Jörn Hentschel; Jochen Heinrichs Journal: PhytoKeys Date: 2012-01-02 Impact factor: 1.635
Authors: Eva Mikulášková; Michal Hájek; Adam Veleba; Matthew G Johnson; Tomáš Hájek; Jonathan A Shaw Journal: Ecol Evol Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Magni Olsen Kyrkjeeide; Kristian Hassel; Kjell Ivar Flatberg; A Jonathan Shaw; Narjes Yousefi; Hans K Stenøien Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Julia Bechteler; Alfons Schäfer-Verwimp; Gaik Ee Lee; Kathrin Feldberg; Oscar Alejandro Pérez-Escobar; Tamás Pócs; Denilson F Peralta; Matthew A M Renner; Jochen Heinrichs Journal: Ecol Evol Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Alina Bączkiewicz; Monika Szczecińska; Jakub Sawicki; Adam Stebel; Katarzyna Buczkowska Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jochen Heinrichs; Shanshan Dong; Alfons Schäfer-Verwimp; Tamás Pócs; Kathrin Feldberg; Aleksandra Czumaj; Alexander R Schmidt; Joachim Reitner; Matt A M Renner; Joern Hentschel; Michael Stech; Harald Schneider Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Theresa M Culley; Ju-Fang Leng; Susan R Kephart; Francis J Cartieri; Kathryn E Theiss Journal: Appl Plant Sci Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 1.936