Literature DB >> 21616154

Ventral striatal signal changes represent missed opportunities and predict future choice.

Christian Büchel1, Stefanie Brassen, Juliana Yacubian, Raffael Kalisch, Tobias Sommer.   

Abstract

Realizing one has missed an opportunity can influence decision behavior in the future, such that a large missed opportunity leads to more risk taking in the next round. To investigate the neuronal mechanism of this phenomenon we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in combination with a sequential decision task in which the magnitude of possible gains linearly increased, but at the same time the gain probability decreased. After subjects decided to stop a trial and to collect the gains, not only the chosen option (actual outcome), but also the alternative option (maximum possible gain in this round) was revealed. Our data show that a missed chance influenced volunteers' decision behavior: volunteers took more risk after rounds in which they had missed a large opportunity. This was paralleled by signal changes in a lateral area of the ventral striatum that scaled with the difference between what could have been gained and what was actually gained in this round. In addition, after gains signal changes in dopaminoceptive structures including the midbrain and ventral striatum together with the insula predicted individual choice behavior in the subsequent round. Thus, our data provide a neural mechanism for how missed opportunities influence future decisions.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21616154     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  14 in total

1.  Altered behavioral and neural responsiveness to counterfactual gains in the elderly.

Authors:  Michael J Tobia; Rong Guo; Jan Gläscher; Ulrike Schwarze; Stefanie Brassen; Christian Büchel; Klaus Obermayer; Tobias Sommer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Predicting risk decisions in a modified Balloon Analogue Risk Task: Conventional and single-trial ERP analyses.

Authors:  Ruolei Gu; Dandan Zhang; Yi Luo; Hongyan Wang; Lucas S Broster
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Behavioral preference in sequential decision-making and its association with anxiety.

Authors:  Dandan Zhang; Ruolei Gu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Reduced feelings of regret and enhanced fronto-striatal connectivity in elders with long-term Tai Chi experience.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Liu; Lin Li; Sijia Liu; Yubin Sun; Shuang Li; Meng Yi; Li Zheng; Xiuyan Guo
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Reward and fictive prediction error signals in ventral striatum: asymmetry between factual and counterfactual processing.

Authors:  E Pomarol-Clotet; J Radua; A Santo-Angles; P Fuentes-Claramonte; I Argila-Plaza; M Guardiola-Ripoll; C Almodóvar-Payá; J Munuera; P J McKenna
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  Once bitten, twice shy: experienced regret and non-adaptive choice switching.

Authors:  Francesco Marcatto; Anna Cosulich; Donatella Ferrante
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Attentional deployment impacts neural response to regret.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Liu; Lin Li; Li Zheng; Min Xu; Fanzhi Anita Zhou; Xiuyan Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Identity prediction errors in the human midbrain update reward-identity expectations in the orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  James D Howard; Thorsten Kahnt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Cognitive neuroscience of human counterfactual reasoning.

Authors:  Nicole Van Hoeck; Patrick D Watson; Aron K Barbey
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Parental inconsistency, impulsive choice and neural value representations in healthy adolescents.

Authors:  S Schneider; J Peters; J M Peth; C Büchel
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 6.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.