Literature DB >> 21616087

Equine behaviour and heart rate in temperament tests with or without rider or handler.

U König von Borstel1, S Euent, P Graf, S König, M Gauly.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare horses' heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (RMSSD, pNN50) and behaviour in the same temperament test when being ridden, led, and released free. Behavioural measurements included scores and linear measurements for reactivity (R), activity (A), time to calm down (T) and emotionality (E), recorded during the approach (1) and/or during confrontation with the stimulus (2). Sixty-five horses were each confronted 3 times (1 ridden, 1 led, 1 free running in balanced order) with 3 novel and/or sudden stimuli. Mixed model analysis indicated that leading resulted in the lowest (P<0.05 throughout) reactions as measured by A1, A2, E1, E2, R2, and pNN50 while riding produced the strongest (A1, T2, HR, RMSSD, pNN50) or medium (E1, E2, R2) reactions. Free running resulted either in the strongest (A2, E1, E2, R2) or in the lowest (A1, T2, HR, RMSSD, pNN50) reactions. The repeatability across tests for HR (0.57), but not for RMSSD (0.23) or pNN50 (0.25) was higher than for any behavioural measurement: the latter ranged from values below 0.10 (A1, A2, T2) to values between 0.30 and 0.45 (E1, E2, R2). Overall, the results show that a rider or handler influences, but not completely masks, the horses' intrinsic behaviour in a temperament test, and this influence appeared to be stronger on behavioural variables and heart rate variability than on the horses' heart rates. Taking both practical considerations and repeatabilities into account, reactivity appears to be the most valuable parameter. Emotionality and heart rate can also yield valid results reflecting additional dimensions of temperament although their practical relevance may be less obvious. If a combination of observed variables is chosen with care, a valid assessment of a horse's temperament may be possible in all types of tests. However, in practice, tests that resemble the practical circumstances most closely, i.e. testing riding horses under a rider, should be chosen.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21616087     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  6 in total

1.  Psychological factors affecting equine performance.

Authors:  Sebastian D McBride; Daniel S Mills
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters.

Authors:  Uta König von Borstel; Chantal Glißman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Horses' attentional characteristics differ according to the type of work.

Authors:  Céline Rochais; Mathilde Stomp; Mélissa Sébilleau; Mathilde Houdebine; Séverine Henry; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Behavioral and cardiac responses in mature horses exposed to a novel object.

Authors:  Kyung Eun Lee; Joon Gyu Kim; Hang Lee; Byung Sun Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-31

5.  Physiological and Behavioral Responses of Dairy Cattle to the Introduction of Robot Scrapers.

Authors:  Renate L Doerfler; Christina Lehermeier; Heike Kliem; Erich Möstl; Heinz Bernhardt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-30

6.  Testing for Behavioral and Physiological Responses of Domestic Horses (Equus caballus) Across Different Contexts - Consistency Over Time and Effects of Context.

Authors:  Alexandra Safryghin; Denise V Hebesberger; Claudia A F Wascher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-04-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.