Literature DB >> 21615660

The evolution of species interactions across natural landscapes.

Mark C Urban1.   

Abstract

Given the potential for rapid and microgeographical adaptation, ecologists increasingly are exploring evolutionary explanations for community patterns. Biotic selection can generate local adaptations that alter species interactions. Although some gene flow might be necessary to fuel local adaptation, higher gene flow can homogenise traits across regions and generate local maladaptation. Herein, I estimate the contributions of local biotic selection, gene flow and spatially autocorrelated biotic selection to among-population divergence in traits involved in species interactions across 75 studies. Local biotic selection explained 6.9% of inter-population trait divergence, an indirect estimate of restricted gene flow explained 0.1%, and spatially autocorrelated selection explained 9.3%. Together, biotic selection explained 16% of the variance in population trait means. Most biotic selection regimes were spatially autocorrelated. Hence, most populations receive gene flow from populations facing similar selection, which could allow for local adaptation despite moderate gene flow. Gene flow constrained adaptation in studies conducted at finer spatial scales as expected, but this effect was often confounded with spatially autocorrelated selection. Results indicate that traits involved in species interactions might often evolve across landscapes, especially when biotic selection is spatially autocorrelated. The frequent evolution of species interactions suggests that evolutionary processes might often influence community ecology.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21615660     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01632.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  9 in total

1.  Local adaptation to parasite selective pressure: comparing three congeneric co-occurring hosts.

Authors:  Carolyn L Keogh; Martha E Sanderson; James E Byers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Genetic differentiation in life history traits and thermal stress performance across a heterogeneous dune landscape in Arabidopsis lyrata.

Authors:  Guillaume Wos; Yvonne Willi
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Interacting phenotypes and the coevolutionary process: Interspecific indirect genetic effects alter coevolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Daniel I Bolnick; Edmund D Brodie; Allen J Moore; Joel W McGlothlin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Evolution mediates the effects of apex predation on aquatic food webs.

Authors:  Mark C Urban
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Foliar fungal endophyte communities are structured by environment but not host ecotype in Panicum virgatum (switchgrass).

Authors:  Briana K Whitaker; Heather L Reynolds; Keith Clay
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. XII. Temporal and spatial heterogeneity.

Authors:  Samuel M Scheiner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 7.  Ecological opportunity and the adaptive diversification of lineages.

Authors:  Gary A Wellborn; R Brian Langerhans
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Spatial pattern of invasion and the evolutionary responses of native plant species.

Authors:  Gisela C Stotz; Ernesto Gianoli; James F Cahill
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 9.  Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics: The Predator-Prey Adaptive Play and the Ecological Theater.

Authors:  Mary K Burak; Julia D Monk; Oswald J Schmitz
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2018-12-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.