Literature DB >> 21615401

Neonatal mortality of elk driven by climate, predator phenology and predator community composition.

Kathleen A Griffin1, Mark Hebblewhite, Hugh S Robinson, Peter Zager, Shannon M Barber-Meyer, David Christianson, Scott Creel, Nyeema C Harris, Mark A Hurley, DeWaine H Jackson, Bruce K Johnson, Woodrow L Myers, Jarod D Raithel, Mike Schlegel, Bruce L Smith, Craig White, P J White.   

Abstract

1. Understanding the interaction among predators and between predation and climate is critical to understanding the mechanisms for compensatory mortality. We used data from 1999 radio-marked neonatal elk (Cervus elaphus) calves from 12 populations in the north-western United States to test for effects of predation on neonatal survival, and whether predation interacted with climate to render mortality compensatory. 2. Weibull survival models with a random effect for each population were fit as a function of the number of predator species in a community (3-5), seven indices of climatic variability, sex, birth date, birth weight, and all interactions between climate and predators. Cumulative incidence functions (CIF) were used to test whether the effects of individual species of predators were additive or compensatory. 3. Neonatal elk survival to 3 months declined following hotter previous summers and increased with higher May precipitation, especially in areas with wolves and/or grizzly bears. Mortality hazards were significantly lower in systems with only coyotes (Canis latrans), cougars (Puma concolor) and black bears (Ursus americanus) compared to higher mortality hazards experienced with gray wolves (Canis lupus) and grizzly bears (Ursus horribilis). 4. In systems with wolves and grizzly bears, mortality by cougars decreased, and predation by bears was the dominant cause of neonatal mortality. Only bear predation appeared additive and occurred earlier than other predators, which may render later mortality by other predators compensatory as calves age. Wolf predation was low and most likely a compensatory source of mortality for neonatal elk calves. 5. Functional redundancy and interspecific competition among predators may combine with the effects of climate on vulnerability to predation to drive compensatory mortality of neonatal elk calves. The exception was the evidence for additive bear predation. These results suggest that effects of predation by recovering wolves on neonatal elk survival, a contentious issue for management of elk populations, may be less important than the composition of the predator community. Future studies would benefit by synthesizing overwinter calf and adult-survival data sets, ideally from experimental studies, to test the roles of predation in annual compensatory and additive mortality of elk.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21615401     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01856.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  29 in total

1.  Climate change can alter predator-prey dynamics and population viability of prey.

Authors:  Guillaume Bastille-Rousseau; James A Schaefer; Michael J L Peers; E Hance Ellington; Matthew A Mumma; Nathaniel D Rayl; Shane P Mahoney; Dennis L Murray
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Recolonizing wolves influence the realized niche of resident cougars.

Authors:  L Mark Elbroch; Patrick E Lendrum; Jesse Newby; Howard Quigley; Daniel J Thompson
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Abundance and phenology patterns of two pond-breeding salamanders determine species interactions in natural populations.

Authors:  Thomas L Anderson; Daniel J Hocking; Christopher A Conner; Julia E Earl; Elizabeth B Harper; Michael S Osbourn; William E Peterman; Tracy A G Rittenhouse; Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Grizzly bear predation links the loss of native trout to the demography of migratory elk in Yellowstone.

Authors:  Arthur D Middleton; Thomas A Morrison; Jennifer K Fortin; Charles T Robbins; Kelly M Proffitt; P J White; Douglas E McWhirter; Todd M Koel; Douglas G Brimeyer; W Sue Fairbanks; Matthew J Kauffman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evaluating apparent competition in limiting the recovery of an endangered ungulate.

Authors:  Heather E Johnson; Mark Hebblewhite; Thomas R Stephenson; David W German; Becky M Pierce; Vernon C Bleich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Large impact of Eurasian lynx predation on roe deer population dynamics.

Authors:  Henrik Andrén; Olof Liberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Scale Dependence of Female Ungulate Reproductive Success in Relation to Nutritional Condition, Resource Selection and Multi-Predator Avoidance.

Authors:  Jared F Duquette; Jerrold L Belant; Nathan J Svoboda; Dean E Beyer; Patrick E Lederle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Underestimating the frequency, strength and cost of antipredator responses with data from GPS collars: an example with wolves and elk.

Authors:  Scott Creel; John A Winnie; David Christianson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Ecosystem scale declines in elk recruitment and population growth with wolf colonization: a before-after-control-impact approach.

Authors:  David Christianson; Scott Creel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Capture method affects survival estimates and subsequent interpretation of ecological covariates for a long-lived cervid.

Authors:  Katherine L Brackel; Eric S Michel; Bailey S Gullikson; Jonathan A Jenks; William F Jensen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.