Literature DB >> 21615222

Endoscopic grading of gastroesophageal flap valve helps predict proton pump inhibitor response in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Jae Hoon Cheong1, Gwang Ha Kim, Bong Eun Lee, Moon Ki Choi, Ji Yoon Moon, Dong Yup Ryu, Dong Uk Kim, Geun Am Song.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Limited information is available on predictors of the response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Endoscopic grading of gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) is simple and reproducible, and can provide useful information on patients with suspected reflux undergoing an endoscopy. The aim of this study was to prospectively identify predictors, including endoscopic findings such as GEFV, for PPI treatment outcomes in patients with GERD.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty consecutive patients with GERD were enrolled. All patients were treated with pantoprazole 40 mg daily for 8 weeks. Treatment response was defined as greater than 50% reduction in symptom scores between the two symptom assessments (i.e., over 4 or 8 weeks). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses between responders and non-responders were performed to identify variables predicting response to pantoprazole treatment.
RESULTS: Of the 150 consecutive patients considered for this study, 31 were excluded based on exclusion criteria and/or refusal to participate, leaving 119 eligible patients. After 4-week pantoprazole treatment, 70 of 119 (58.8%) patients were classified as responders. Patients with obesity and Helicobacter pylori infection demonstrated a higher response rate to 4-week pantoprazole treatment (odds ratio (OR) 5.28, p = 0.008; OR 3.76, p = 0.023, respectively). Patients with abnormal GEFV showed a lower response rate to 4-week treatment (OR 0.17, p = 0.016). After 8-week treatment, 86 of 119 (72.3%) patients were classified as responders. Abnormal GEFV and aspirin intake were associated with a lower response rate to 8-week treatment (OR 0.17, p = 0.021; OR 0.11, p = 0.020, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal GEFV was a significant independent factor predicting poor response to both 4-week and 8-week pantoprazole treatment. Endoscopic grading of GEFV provides useful information for predicting the response to PPI treatment in patients with GERD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21615222     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2011.579154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  10 in total

1.  Endoscopic grading of the gastroesophageal flap valve is correlated with reflux activity and can predict the size of the esophageal hiatus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Oliver Owen Koch; Georg Spaun; Stavros A Antoniou; Charlotte Rabl; Gernot Köhler; Klaus Emmanuel; Dietmar Öfner; Rudolph Pointner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impacts of endoscopic gastroesophageal flap valve grading on pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Kai-Chi Chang; Jia-Feng Wu; Wei-Chung Hsu; Bor-Ru Lin; Huey-Ling Chen; Yen-Hsuan Ni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Gastroesophageal flap valve reflected EGJ morphology and correlated to acid reflux.

Authors:  Chenxi Xie; Yuwen Li; Ning Zhang; Lishou Xiong; Minhu Chen; Yinglian Xiao
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Barrett's Neoplasia in Korea: a Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Dong Chan Joo; Gwang Ha Kim; Bong Eun Lee; Moon Won Lee; Dong Hoon Baek; Geun Am Song; Sojeong Lee; Do Youn Park
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.720

5.  New endoscopic capsule vs upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in preoperative work-up of obese candidate for bariatric surgery: Relevance of a pilot study in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Giuseppe Galloro; Mario Musella; Saverio Siciliano; Giovanna Berardi; Antonio Vitiello; Nunzio Velotti; Fernando Rizzello; Paolo Gionchetti; Carlo Calabrese
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-02-15

6.  Clinical predictors for response to proton pump inhibitor treatment in patients with globus.

Authors:  Hye Kyung Jeon; Gwang Ha Kim; Mun Ki Choi; Jae Hoon Cheong; Dong Hoon Baek; Gwang Jae Lee; Hang Mi Lee; Bong Eun Lee; Geun Am Song
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.924

7.  Hill classification is superior to the axial length of a hiatal hernia for assessment of the mechanical anti-reflux barrier at the gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Ida Hansdotter; Ove Björ; Anna Andreasson; Lars Agreus; Per Hellström; Anna Forsberg; Nicholas J Talley; Michael Vieth; Bengt Wallner
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-02-10

8.  Abnormal Gastroesophageal Flap Valve Is Associated With High Gastresophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire Score and the Severity of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Vietnamese Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms.

Authors:  Duc T Quach; Trang T Nguyen; Toru Hiyama
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

9.  Clinical Characteristics of Severe Erosive Esophagitis among Patients with Erosive Esophagitis: A Case-control Study.

Authors:  Tomonori Ida; Masahiko Inamori; Yumi Inoh; Koji Fujita; Jun Hamanaka; Hideyuki Chiba; Akihiko Kusakabe; Taiki Morohashi; Toru Goto; Shin Maeda
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.271

10.  Preoperative diagnosis of hiatal hernia: barium swallow X-ray, high-resolution manometry, or endoscopy?

Authors:  Michael Weitzendorfer; Gernot Köhler; Stavros A Antoniou; Leo Pallwein-Prettner; Lisa Manzenreiter; Philipp Schredl; Klaus Emmanuel; Oliver Owen Koch
Journal:  Eur Surg       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 0.953

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.