| Literature DB >> 21614435 |
U U Nwodo1, A A Ngene, C U Iroegbu, O A L Onyedikachi, V N Chigor, A I Okoh.
Abstract
Cajanus cajan, a tropical shrub, serves as source of food and traditional medicines. The evaluation of aqueous and ethanol extracts for activity against measles virus and toxicity to embryonated chicken eggs was carried out in this study. In vivo and in vitro assay techniques using embryonated chicken eggs and tissue culture (Hep-2 cell lines) as media for both virus cultivation and anti-virus assay showed that a hot-water extract yielded higher activity against measles virus. The hot-water extract of the stem yielded a Log(2) titre of 0.1 for the in vivo assay and an inhibition of cytopathic effect (CPE) in Hep-2 cells by 100% for the in vitro assay. At all concentrations of the extracts, there was a lowering of virus concentration (p = 0.05), indicated by hemagglutination (HA) titration, which is the advantage of HA titration over the tissue culture technique using CPE. This study validates embryonated chicken eggs as suitable media for anti-virus assay and the use of C. cajan in the treatment of some diseases of viral origin.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21614435 PMCID: PMC3163796 DOI: 10.1007/s00705-011-1032-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Virol ISSN: 0304-8608 Impact factor: 2.574
The pH, percentage yield and LD50 of Cajanus cajan extracts
| Plant material | Extract | pH | % yield | LD50 (mg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | LWC | 4.81 | 12.19 | 639.0 |
| LHW | 5.14 | 9.15 | 616.0 | |
| LET | 5.19 | 11.52 | 742.0 | |
| Stems | SWC | 4.45 | 10.19 | 651.0 |
| SHW | 5.12 | 7.45 | 634.0 | |
| SET | 5.31 | 9.76 | 719.0 | |
| Roots | RWC | 4.65 | 8.51 | 602.0 |
| RHW | 5.51 | 6.45 | 626.0 | |
| RET | 5.22 | 7.28 | 707.0 |
LWC = cold-water extracts of the leaves; LHW = hot-water extracts of the leaves; LET = ethanol extracts of the leaves; SWC = cold-water extracts of the stem; SHW = hot-water extract of the stem; SET = ethanol extracts of the stem; RWC = cold-water extracts of the root; RHW = hot-water extracts of the root; RET = ethanol extracts of the root
In vivo screening of C. cajan at 250 mg ml−1 for anti-MV in ECE employing spot HA on allantoic fluid
| Inoculation route | Plant extract | Control | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LWC | LHW | LET | SWC | SHW | SET | RWC | RHW | RET | PBS control | Virus control | |
| Albumen | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | + |
| Allantoic cavity | + | − | − | + | - | − | + | − | − | − | + |
+ = Presence of agglutination
− = Absence of agglutination
In vitro screening of C. cajan at 250 mg ml−1 for anti-MV activity in Hep-2 tissue culture
| Activity and morphology | Plant extract | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LWC | LHW | LET | SWC | SHW | SET | RWC | RHW | RET | Virus control | |
| Anti-MV Activity | − | + | + | − | + | + | − | + | + | − |
| Hep-2 cell morphology | R | N | N | R | N | N | R | N | N | R |
+ = Absence of cytopathic effect; − = Presence of cytopathic effect; R = Cells where round in shape (cytopathic effect was observed); N = Cells where normal in shape (cytopathic effect was not observed)
Fig. 1HA titre of the in vivo evaluation of root extracts of C. cajan for anti-MV activity. PBS represents phosphate buffer control; RWC represents cold-water extract of the root; RHW represents hot-water extract of the root; RET represents ethanol extract of the root
Fig. 2HA titre of the in vivo evaluation of stem extracts of C. cajan for anti-MV activity. PBS represents phosphate buffer control; SWC represents cold-water extract of the stem; SHW represents hot-water extract of the stem; SET represents ethanol extract of the stem
Fig. 3HA titre of the in vivo evaluation of leaf extracts of C. cajan for anti-MV activity. PBS represents phosphate buffer control; LWC represents cold-water extract of the leaves; LHW represents hot-water extract of the leaves; LET represents ethanol extract of the leaves
In vitro anti-MV activity of C. cajan extracts
| Concentration (mg/ml) | % inhibition of cytopathic effect by | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWC | SHW | SET | RWC | RHW | RET | |
| 3.91 | − | + | + | − | + | + |
| 7.81 | − | + | + | − | + | + |
| 15.63 | − | + + | + + | − | + + | + |
| 31.25 | − | ++ | + + | − | + + | ++ |
| 62.50 | − | ++ | + + | − | +++ | +++ |
| 125 | + | +++ | +++ | − | +++ | +++ |
| 250 | + | +++ | +++ | + | +++ | +++ |
| Extract control | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| PBS control | N | N | N | N | N | N |
+++ = 100–80% inhibition of CPE; ++ = 79–60% inhibition of CPE; + = 59–30% inhibition of CPE; − = 29–0% inhibition of CPE; N = cells were normal in shape
Phytochemical composition of Cajanus cajan extracted with ethanol and water (hot and cold)
| Phytochemicals | Leaves | Stems | Roots | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LWC | LHW | LET | SWC | SHW | SET | RWC | RHW | RET | |
| Alkaloids | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | − |
| Tannins | − | + | + | + | ++ | ++ | − | + | ++ |
| Saponins | + | − | ++ | + | − | ++ | − | − | + |
| Flavonoids | + | +++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ |
| Carbohydrates | + | ++ | + | + | ++ | + | + | ++ | ++ |
| Glycosides | ++ | + | ++ | + | + | ++ | − | − | − |
| Reducing sugars | ++ | + | ++ | + | + | ++ | + | + | ++ |
+ = Present in trace amounts; ++ = Present in moderate amounts; +++ = Present in high amounts; − = Not detected