| Literature DB >> 21614165 |
Anabelle Silva Cornachione1, Priscila Cação Oliveira Benedini-Elias, Juliana Cristina Polizello, Leonardo César Carvalho, Ana Cláudia Mattiello-Sverzut.
Abstract
We analyzed lesser diameter and distribution of fiber types in different skeletal muscles from female Wistar rats using a histoenzymology Myofibrillar Adenosine Tri-phosphatase (mATPase) method. Fragments from muscles were frozen and processed by mATPase in different pH. Adult and weanling rat soleus muscles presented a predominance of type I fibers and larger fiber diameters. In the plantar muscle in adult rats, the type IIB fibers demonstrated greater lesser diameter while in the weanling animals, types I and IIB fibers were larger. The plantar muscle of animals of both ages was composed predominantly of the type IID fibers. The type IID fibers were observed in similar amounts in the lateral gastrocnemius and the medial gastrocnemius muscles. Type IIB fibers showed predominance and presented higher size in comparison with other types in the EDL muscle. The present study shows that data on fiber type distribution and fiber lesser diameter obtained in adult animals cannot always be applied to weanling animals of the same species. Using the mATPase, despite the difficult handling, is an important tool to determine the different characteristics of the specific fibers in the skeletal muscle tissue.Entities:
Keywords: adult rats; fibers type; histoenzymology technique; skeletal muscle; weanling rats
Year: 2011 PMID: 21614165 PMCID: PMC3096081 DOI: 10.1267/ahc.10031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Histochem Cytochem ISSN: 0044-5991 Impact factor: 1.938
Different values of pH used in the mATPase technique, in the different muscles studied in female Wistar rats
| Acid pH | Básic pH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| SOL(W) | 4.3 | 4.6 | 9.8 |
| PLA(W) | 4.4 | 4.6 | 10.4 |
| GLD(A) | 4.3 | 4.6 | 9.9 |
| GMD(A) | 4.3 | 4.6 | 9.9 |
| SOL(A) | 4.3 | 4.6 | 9.4 |
| PLA(A) | 4.3 | 4.6 | 10.4 |
| EDL(A) | 4.3 | 4.6 | 10.3 |
SOL(W), soleus in weanling animals; PLA(W), plantar in weanling rats; GLD(A), lateral profound gastrocnemius in adult animals; GMD(A), medial profound gastrocnemius in adult animals; SOL(A), Soleus in adult animals; PLA(A), plantar in adult animals; EDL(A), extensor digitorum longus in adult animals.
Spectrum of color intensities using mATPase reaction in different pH according to the muscles investigated in the female Wistar rats
| Color intensity of the different fiber type | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIF | TIICF | TIIAF | TIIADF | TIIDF | TIIBF | ||
| SOL(W) | pH 9.8 | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | Ø | Ø |
| pH 4.6 | ++ | + | – | ± | Ø | Ø | |
| pH 4.3 | ++ | ± | – | – | Ø | Ø | |
| PLA(W) | pH 10.4 | – | ++ | ++ | Ø | ++ | + |
| pH 4.6 | ++ | + | – | Ø | ± | ± | |
| pH 4.4 | ++ | ± | – | Ø | – | – | |
| GLD(A) | pH 9.9 | – | Ø | ++ | ++ | ++ | Ø |
| pH 4.6 | ++ | Ø | – | ± | + | Ø | |
| pH 4.3 | ++ | Ø | – | – | – | Ø | |
| GMD(A) | pH 9.9 | – | Ø | ++ | ++ | ++ | + |
| pH 4.6 | ++ | Ø | – | ± | + | + | |
| pH 4.3 | ++ | Ø | – | – | – | – | |
| SOL(A) | pH 9.4 | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | Ø | Ø |
| pH 4.6 | ++ | + | – | ± | Ø | Ø | |
| pH 4.3 | ++ | ± | – | – | Ø | Ø | |
| PLA(A) | pH 10.4 | – | ++ | ++ | Ø | ++ | + |
| pH 4.6 | ++ | + | – | Ø | ± | ± | |
| pH 4.3 | ++ | ± | – | Ø | – | – | |
| EDL(A) | pH 10.3 | – | + | ++ | Ø | ++ | + |
| pH 4.6 | ++ | + | – | Ø | ± | ± | |
| pH 4.3 | ++ | ± | – | Ø | – | – | |
– clear; ± intermediate clear; + intermediate dark; ++ dark; Ø fiber type unidentified.
Fig. 1Photomicrographs of muscle fragments processed by the mATPase reaction showing different pure and hybrid fibers in muscles selected for the study. A–C: Weanling soleus muscle: A in pH 9.8; B in pH 4.6; C in pH 4.3. D–F: Weanling plantar muscle: D in pH 10.4; E in pH 4.6; F in pH 4.4. G–I: Adult lateral gastrocnemius muscle: G in pH 9.9; H in pH 4.6; I in pH 4.3. J–L: Adult medial gastrocnemius muscle: J in pH 9.9; K in pH 4.6; L in pH 4.3. M–O: Adult soleus muscle: M in pH 9.4; N in pH 4.6; O in pH 4.3. P–R: Adult plantar muscle: P in pH 10.4; Q in pH 4.6; R in pH 4.3. S–U: Adult EDL muscle: S in pH 10.3; T in pH 4.6; U in pH 4.3. Note that for all the muscles studied the pH 4.6 value proved to be the most appropriate to define the largest spectrum of skeletal muscular tissue fiber. The alkaline values and the more acid complemented the classification of the rest of the fibers, pure and hybrid. Bars=50 µm.
Means±standard deviation of lesser diameter (µm) measurements in muscle fibers of female weanling (n=3) and adult (n=6) Wistar rats
| Lesser diameter (µm) ± SD in different fibers | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIF | TIICF | TIIACF | TIIAF | TIIADF | TIIDF | TIIBF | |
| SOL(W) | 23.35±0.78 | 17.66±0.86A | 18.85±0.66A | 19.21±1.41A | 18.70±1.06A | 19.7±2.37A | — |
| PLA(W) | 19.41±1.41 | 15.92±1.24A;B | — | 16.60±1.37B | — | 16.64±0.12B | 19.78±0.32 |
| GLD(A) | 31.49±4.98 | 23.47±5.22 | — | 24.97±3.69 | 27.07±3.05 | 29.43±3.34 | — |
| GMD(A) | 34.54±3.16C | 28.92±6.69 | — | 29.95±2.04 | 32.21±3.14 | 36.65±1.57C | ** |
| SOL(A) | 42.61±4.01 | 35.05±3.95A | 38.62±4.94 | 36.54±3.28 | 36.94±4.11 | 35.09±4.91 | — |
| PLA(A) | 36.29±2.56B | ** | — | 32.56±1.32B | — | 38.91±1.70C | 41.68±1.98 |
| EDL(A) | 23.60±1.58B | 25.19±4.94B | — | 24.20±2.65B | 24.74±3.94B | 30.18±3.72 | 33.07±4.69 |
SOL(W), soleus in weanling animals; PLA(W), plantar in weanling rats; GLD(A), lateral profound gastrocnemius in adult animals; GMD(A), medial profound gastrocnemius in adult animals; SOL(A), Soleus in adult animals; PLA(A), plantar in adult animals; EDL(A), extensor digitorum longus in adult animals. Tukey-Kramer (p<0.05): A vs TIF; B vs TIIBF; C vs TIIAF. **Present in some animals.
Means±standard deviation of proportions (%) of different fiber types evaluated in different muscles of female weanling (n=3) and adult (n=6) Wistar rats
| Types of fibers (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIF | TIICF | TIIACF | TIIAF | TIIADF | TIIDF | TIIBF | |
| SOL(W) | 49.01±5.86 | 4.16±1.54a | 4.86±2.6a,b | 33.8±12.85a | 7.97±4.56a,b | 1.66±0.9a | — |
| PLA(W) | 9.37±1.39b,d,e | 1.28±0.62a,b,d,e | — | 32.66±5.11d | — | 38.82±4.73 | 18.16±5.6b,d |
| GLD(A) | 21.72±7.63d | 4.13±2.25a,c,d | — | 13.66±6.74a,d | 15.04±9.41a,d | 56.49±9.04 | — |
| GMD(A) | 15.2±6.47d | 2.67±0.05a,b,d | — | 14.53±5.72d | 14.06±5.79d | 56.41±11.06 | 5.71±0d |
| SOL(A) | 54.28±6.25 | 6.13±3.03a,b | 2.8±1.78a,b,c,d | 24.22±7.45a | 8.56±5.01a,b | 9.97±6.9a,b | — |
| PLA(A) | 8.69±3.27b,d,e | 0.74±0b,d,e | — | 22.83±4.47d | — | 49.56±7.12 | 18.76±10.22d |
| EDL(A) | 5.93±2.74b,d,e | 2.73±2.15b,d,e | — | 17.62±7.99e | 6.72±5.01b,d,e | 14.29±8.25e | 54.29±10.96 |
SOL(W), soleus in weanling animals; PLA(W), plantar in weanling rats; GLD(A), lateral profound gastrocnemius in adult animals; GMD(A), medial profound gastrocnemius in adult animals; SOL(A), Soleus in adult animals; PLA(A), plantar in adult animals; EDL(A), extensor digitorum longus in adult animals. a p<0.05 compared with TIF; b p<0.05 compared with TIIAF; c p<0.05 compared with TIIADF; d p<0.05 compared with TIIADF; e p<0.05 compared with TIIBF.