Literature DB >> 2161414

Comparison of [11C]diprenorphine and [11C]carfentanil binding to opiate receptors in humans by positron emission tomography.

J J Frost1, H S Mayberg, B Sadzot, R F Dannals, J R Lever, H T Ravert, A A Wilson, H N Wagner, J M Links.   

Abstract

The kinetics and regional distribution of [11C]carfentanil, a mu-selective opiate receptor agonist, and [11C]diprenorphine, a nonselective opiate receptor antagonist, were compared using paired positron emission tomography studies in two normal volunteers. Kinetics of total radioactivity (counts/mCi/pixel) was greater for [11C]diprenorphine than [11C]carfentanil in all regions. [11C]Carfentanil binding (expressed as the total/nonspecific ratio) reached near equilibrium at approximately 40 min, whereas [11C]diprenorphine showed a linear increase until approximately 60 min. Kinetics of specific binding demonstrated significant dissociation of [11C]carfentanil from opiate receptors, whereas little dissociation of [11C]diprenorphine was observed during the 90-min scan session. Regional distributions of [11C]carfentanil and [11C]diprenorphine were qualitatively and quantitatively different: Relative to the thalamus (a region with known predominance of mu-receptors), [11C]diprenorphine displayed greater binding in the striatum and cingulate and frontal cortex compared to [11C]carfentanil, consistent with labeling of additional, non-mu sites by [11C]diprenorphine. We conclude from these studies that [11C]diprenorphine labels other opiate receptor subtypes in addition to the mu sites selectively labeled by [11C]carfentanil. The nonselective nature of diprenorphine potentially limits its usefulness in defining abnormalities of specific opiate receptor subtypes in various diseases. Development of selective tracers for the delta- and kappa-opiate receptor sites, or alternatively use of unlabeled inhibitors to differentially displace mu, delta, and kappa subtypes, will help offset these limitations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2161414     DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1990.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab        ISSN: 0271-678X            Impact factor:   6.200


  15 in total

1.  Pain imaging in the emerging era of molecular medicine.

Authors:  Christian S Stohler; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

2.  Positron emission tomography imaging of mu- and delta-opioid receptor binding in alcohol-dependent and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  Elise M Weerts; Gary S Wand; Hiroto Kuwabara; Cynthia A Munro; Robert F Dannals; John Hilton; J James Frost; Mary E McCaul
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 3.  Non-invasive methods to study drug disposition: positron emission tomography. Detection and quantification of brain receptors in man.

Authors:  B Sadzot; G Franck
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  The relationship between naloxone-induced cortisol and delta opioid receptor availability in mesolimbic structures is disrupted in alcohol-dependent subjects.

Authors:  Gary S Wand; Elise M Weerts; Hiroto Kuwabara; Dean F Wong; Xiaoqiang Xu; Mary E McCaul
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 5.  Development of (18)F-labeled radiotracers for neuroreceptor imaging with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Peter Brust; Jörg van den Hoff; Jörg Steinbach
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.203

6.  The relationship between naloxone-induced cortisol and mu opioid receptor availability in mesolimbic structures is disrupted in alcohol dependent subjects.

Authors:  Gary S Wand; Elise M Weerts; Hiroto Kuwabara; Dean F Wong; Xiaoqiang Xu; Mary E McCaul
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.405

7.  Naloxone-induced cortisol predicts mu opioid receptor binding potential in specific brain regions of healthy subjects.

Authors:  Gary S Wand; Elise M Weerts; Hiroto Kuwabara; J James Frost; Xiaoqiang Xu; Mary E McCaul
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 4.905

8.  A method of studying pharmacokinetics in man at picomolar drug concentrations.

Authors:  V J Cunningham; V W Pike; D Bailey; C A Freemantle; B C Page; A K Jones; M J Kensett; D Bateman; S K Luthra; T Jones
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Preparation and biodistribution in mice of [11C]carfentanil: a radiopharmaceutical for studying brain mu-opioid receptors by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  H Saji; D Tsutsumi; Y Magata; Y Iida; J Konishi; A Yokoyama
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 10.  [Positron emission tomography in pain research. From the structure to the activity of the opiate receptor system].

Authors:  T Sprenger; G Henriksen; M Valet; S Platzer; A Berthele; T R Tölle
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.