Literature DB >> 21613940

Soft tissue biotype affects implant success.

Angie Lee1, Jia-Hui Fu, Hom-Lay Wang.   

Abstract

The influence of tissue biotype in natural dentition is already well demonstrated in the literature, with numerous articles showing that thicker tissue is a preferred biotype for optimal surgical and prosthetic outcomes. In this same line of thought, current studies are directed to explore whether mucosal thickness would have similar implications around dental implants. The purpose of this review was to investigate the effects of soft tissue biotype in relation to success of implant therapy. The influence of tissue biotype was divided into 3 main categories: its relationship with periimplant mucosa and the underlying bone, immediate implant placement, and restorative outcomes. Soft tissue biotype is an important parameter to consider in achieving esthetic implant restoration, improving immediate implant success, and preventing future mucosal recession.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21613940     DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182181d3d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  10 in total

1.  Peri-implant complications for posterior endosteal implants.

Authors:  Josephine Esquivel-Upshaw; Alex Mehler; Arthur Clark; Dan Neal; Luiz Gonzaga; Kenneth Anusavice
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Correlation of soft tissue biotype with pink aesthetic score in single full veneer crown.

Authors:  Sanjog Agarwal; Subhabrata Maiti; V Ashok
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2020-12-31

3.  Minimally Invasive Alveolar Ridge Preservation Utilizing an In Situ Hardening β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitute: A Multicenter Case Series.

Authors:  Minas D Leventis; Peter Fairbairn; Ashish Kakar; Angelos D Leventis; Vasileios Margaritis; Walter Lückerath; Robert A Horowitz; Bappanadu H Rao; Annette Lindner; Heiner Nagursky
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-04-14

4.  Hard and Soft Tissue Management of a Localized Alveolar Ridge Atrophy with Autogenous Sources and Biomaterials: A Challenging Clinical Case.

Authors:  C Maiorana; D Andreoni; P P Poli
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-09-21

5.  Improved accuracy in periodontal pocket depth measurement using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Sul-Hee Kim; Se-Ryong Kang; Hee-Jung Park; Jun-Min Kim; Won-Jin Yi; Tae-Il Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  How Thick Is the Oral Mucosa around Implants after Augmentation with Different Materials: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Substitute Matrices in Comparison to Connective Tissue Grafts.

Authors:  Martin Lissek; Martin Boeker; Arndt Happe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Gingival phenotype distribution in young Caucasian women and men - An investigative study.

Authors:  Kai R Fischer; Jasmin Büchel; Frederic Kauffmann; Christian Heumann; Anton Friedmann; Patrick R Schmidlin
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-11-11

8.  Peri-implant marginal bone loss and systemic statin use: A retrospective cohort pilot study.

Authors:  Behzad Bahrami-Hessari; Leif Jansson
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-10-29

9.  Assessment of Periodontal Biotype in a Young Chinese Population using Different Measurement Methods.

Authors:  Yunmin Shao; Lanlan Yin; Jianyu Gu; Dongmiao Wang; Wei Lu; Ying Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Correlation between Buccal Bone Thickness at Implant Placement in Healed Sites and Buccal Soft Tissue Maturation Pattern: A Prospective Three-Year Study.

Authors:  Davide Farronato; Pietro Mario Pasini; Andrea Alain Orsina; Mattia Manfredini; Lorenzo Azzi; Marco Farronato
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.