Susan Burt1, Ken Crombie, Yan Jin, Steve Wurzelbacher, Jessica Ramsey, James Deddens. 1. Industrywide Studies Branch, Division of Surveillance Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Pkwy, Mail Stop R-15, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA. sburt@cdc.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the relationship between workplace physical factors, particularly hand activity level (HAL) and forceful exertion and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), while taking into account individual factors. To compare quantitative exposure assessment measures with more practical ratings-based measures. METHODS: In a group of healthcare and manufacturing workers, each study participant's job tasks were evaluated for HAL, forceful exertion and other physical stressors and videotaped for further analysis, including frequency and duration of exertion and postural deviation. Electrodiagnostic testing of median and ulnar nerves and questionnaires were administered to all participants. A CTS case required median mononeuropathy and symptoms on hand diagrams in fingers 1-3. Multiple logistic regression models were used to analyse associations between job and individual factors and CTS. RESULTS: Of 477 workers studied, 57 (11.9%) were dominant hand CTS cases. Peak force ≥70% maximum voluntary contraction versus <20% maximum voluntary contraction resulted in an OR of 2.74 (1.32-5.68) for CTS. Among those with a body mass index ≥30, the OR for ≥15 exertions per minute was 3.35 (1.14-9.87). Peak worker ratings of perceived exertion increased the odds for CTS by 1.14 (1.01-1.29) for each unit increase on the 10-point scale. The odds for CTS increased by 1.38 (1.05-1.81) for each unit increase on the HAL 10-point scale among men, but not women. Combined force and HAL values above the ACGIH TLV for HAL resulted in an OR of 2.96 (1.51-5.80) for CTS. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative and ratings-based job exposure measures were each associated with CTS. Obesity increased the association between frequency of exertion and CTS.
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the relationship between workplace physical factors, particularly hand activity level (HAL) and forceful exertion and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), while taking into account individual factors. To compare quantitative exposure assessment measures with more practical ratings-based measures. METHODS: In a group of healthcare and manufacturing workers, each study participant's job tasks were evaluated for HAL, forceful exertion and other physical stressors and videotaped for further analysis, including frequency and duration of exertion and postural deviation. Electrodiagnostic testing of median and ulnar nerves and questionnaires were administered to all participants. A CTS case required median mononeuropathy and symptoms on hand diagrams in fingers 1-3. Multiple logistic regression models were used to analyse associations between job and individual factors and CTS. RESULTS: Of 477 workers studied, 57 (11.9%) were dominant hand CTS cases. Peak force ≥70% maximum voluntary contraction versus <20% maximum voluntary contraction resulted in an OR of 2.74 (1.32-5.68) for CTS. Among those with a body mass index ≥30, the OR for ≥15 exertions per minute was 3.35 (1.14-9.87). Peak worker ratings of perceived exertion increased the odds for CTS by 1.14 (1.01-1.29) for each unit increase on the 10-point scale. The odds for CTS increased by 1.38 (1.05-1.81) for each unit increase on the HAL 10-point scale among men, but not women. Combined force and HAL values above the ACGIH TLV for HAL resulted in an OR of 2.96 (1.51-5.80) for CTS. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative and ratings-based job exposure measures were each associated with CTS. Obesity increased the association between frequency of exertion and CTS.
Authors: Sara E Luckhaupt; James M Dahlhamer; Brian W Ward; Marie H Sweeney; John P Sestito; Geoffrey M Calvert Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Jay M Kapellusch; Frederic E Gerr; Elizabeth J Malloy; Arun Garg; Carisa Harris-Adamson; Stephen S Bao; Susan E Burt; Ann Marie Dale; Ellen A Eisen; Bradley A Evanoff; Kurt T Hegmann; Barbara A Silverstein; Matthew S Theise; David M Rempel Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Chia-Hsiung Chen; David P Azari; Yu Hen Hu; Mary J Lindstrom; Darryl Thelen; Thomas Y Yen; Robert G Radwin Journal: Ergonomics Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Robert G Radwin; David P Azari; Mary J Lindstrom; Sheryl S Ulin; Thomas J Armstrong; David Rempel Journal: Ergonomics Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Oguz Akkas; David P Azari; Chia-Hsiung Eric Chen; Yu Hen Hu; Sheryl S Ulin; Thomas J Armstrong; David Rempel; Robert G Radwin Journal: Ergonomics Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Mary A Fox; Kristen Spicer; L Casey Chosewood; Pam Susi; Douglas O Johns; G Scott Dotson Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 9.621