Literature DB >> 21613431

Comparison of direct colony method versus extraction method for identification of gram-positive cocci by use of Bruker Biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Adnan A Alatoom1, Scott A Cunningham, Sherry M Ihde, Jayawant Mandrekar, Robin Patel.   

Abstract

We evaluated Bruker Biotyper (version 2.0) matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) for the identification of 305 clinical isolates of staphylococci, streptococci, and related genera by comparing direct colony testing with preparatory extraction. Isolates were previously identified by use of phenotypic testing and/or 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Manufacturer-specified score cutoffs for genus- and species-level identification were used. After excluding 7 isolates not present in the Biotyper library, the Biotyper correctly identified 284 (95%) and 207 (69%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively, using extraction. By using direct colony testing, the Biotyper identified 168 (56%) and 60 (20%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively. Overall, more isolates were identified to the genus and species levels with preparatory extraction than with direct colony testing (P < 0.0001). The analysis was repeated after dividing the isolates into two subgroups, staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci (n = 217) and "related genera" (n = 81). For the former subgroup, the extraction method resulted in the identification of 213 (98%) and 171 (79%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively, whereas the direct colony method identified 136 (63%) and 56 (26%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively. In contrast, for the subgroup of related genera, the extraction method identified 71 (88%) and 36 (44%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively, while the direct colony method identified 32 (40%) and 4 (5%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively. For both subgroups, preparatory extraction was superior to direct colony testing for the identification of isolates to the genus and species levels (P < 0.0001). Preparatory extraction is needed for the identification of a substantial proportion of Gram-positive cocci using the Biotyper method according to manufacturer-specified score cutoffs.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21613431      PMCID: PMC3147777          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00506-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Sample preparation of Gram-positive bacteria for identification by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight.

Authors:  Sandra C Smole; Lisa A King; Peter E Leopold; Robert D Arbeit
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.363

2.  Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry methods with conventional phenotypic identification for routine identification of bacteria to the species level.

Authors:  Abdessalam Cherkaoui; Jonathan Hibbs; Stéphane Emonet; Manuela Tangomo; Myriam Girard; Patrice Francois; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Identification of Streptococcus agalactiae isolates from various phylogenetic lineages by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Marie-Frédérique Lartigue; Geneviève Héry-Arnaud; Eve Haguenoer; Anne-Sophie Domelier; Pierre-Olivier Schmit; Nathalie van der Mee-Marquet; Philippe Lanotte; Laurent Mereghetti; Markus Kostrzewa; Roland Quentin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Piseth Seng; Michel Drancourt; Frédérique Gouriet; Bernard La Scola; Pierre-Edouard Fournier; Jean Marc Rolain; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Performance of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry system for the identification of bacterial isolates in the clinical routine laboratory.

Authors:  Ulrich Eigner; Martin Holfelder; Klaus Oberdorfer; Ulrike Betz-Wild; Daniela Bertsch; Anne-Marie Fahr
Journal:  Clin Lab       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.138

6.  Performance and cost analysis of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for routine identification of yeast.

Authors:  Neelam Dhiman; Leslie Hall; Sherri L Wohlfiel; Seanne P Buckwalter; Nancy L Wengenack
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of bacterial strains routinely isolated in a clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  A Bizzini; C Durussel; J Bille; G Greub; G Prod'hom
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  High-throughput identification of bacteria and yeast by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry in conventional medical microbiology laboratories.

Authors:  S Q van Veen; E C J Claas; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rapid identification of viridans streptococci by mass spectrometric discrimination.

Authors:  C Friedrichs; A C Rodloff; G S Chhatwal; W Schellenberger; K Eschrich
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Identification of a variety of Staphylococcus species by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Damien Dubois; David Leyssene; Jean Paul Chacornac; Markus Kostrzewa; Pierre Olivier Schmit; Régine Talon; Richard Bonnet; Julien Delmas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  78 in total

1.  Identification of non-diphtheriae corynebacterium by use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Adnan A Alatoom; Charles J Cazanave; Scott A Cunningham; Sherry M Ihde; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Effects of solid-medium type on routine identification of bacterial isolates by use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Neil W Anderson; Blake W Buchan; Katherine M Riebe; Lauren N Parsons; Stacy Gnacinski; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Identification of clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  D P Fedorko; S K Drake; F Stock; P R Murray
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Thymidine auxotrophic Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variant endocarditis and left ventricular assist device infection.

Authors:  Awele Maduka-Ezeh; Maria Teresa Seville; Shimon Kusne; Holenarasipur R Vikram; Janis E Blair; Kerryl Greenwood-Quaintance; Francisco Arabia; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Dermatophyte identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Elitza S Theel; Leslie Hall; Jayawant Mandrekar; Nancy L Wengenack
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Verification of a Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Method for Diagnostic Identification of High-Consequence Bacterial Pathogens.

Authors:  Dobryan M Tracz; Kym S Antonation; Cindi R Corbett
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Direct Identification of Aerobic Bacteria by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Is Accurate and Robust.

Authors:  Javier Mestas; Teephany Quias; Jennifer Dien Bard
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae by the Bruker Biotyper Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry System Is Improved by a Database Extension.

Authors:  Valentijn A Schweitzer; Alje P van Dam; I Putu Yuda Hananta; Rob Schuurman; Johannes G Kusters; Rob J Rentenaar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparing Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry and Phenotypic and Molecular Methods for Identification of Species within the Streptococcus anginosus Group.

Authors:  Raquel Arinto-Garcia; Marcos Daniel Pinho; João André Carriço; José Melo-Cristino; Mário Ramirez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  TLR4 and TLR21 expression, MIF, IFN-β, MD-2, CD14 activation, and sIgA production in chickens administered with EFAL41 strain challenged with Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Karaffová V; Marcinková E; Bobíková K; Herich R; Revajová V; Stašová D; Kavuľová A; Levkutová M; Levkut M; Lauková A; Ševčíková Z; Levkut M
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.