Lorraine R Reitzel 1 , Jennifer B McClure , Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel , Carlos A Mazas , Yumei Cao , Paul M Cinciripini , Jennifer Irvin Vidrine , Yisheng Li , David W Wetter Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Show RCT »
Hide RCT «
BACKGROUND: The current study evaluated the efficacy of an individualized, hand-held computer-delivered treatment (CDT) versus standard treatment (ST ) for the maintenance of smoking abstinence following a quit attempt. METHODS: Participants were 303 adult daily smokers randomized to CDT or ST, plus pharmacotherapy . Abstinence though 1 year was examined using logistic random intercept models, a type of generalized linear mixed model regression. RESULTS: Results did not support the efficacy of the CDT program through 1 year postquit in analyses adjusted for time and study site (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.55-1.30), or after further adjusting for race/ethnicity, age, gender, education, marital status, and the number of cigarettes smoked per day before quitting (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.57-1.39). CONCLUSIONS: CDT did not increase short- or long-term abstinence rates over ST in this study. IMPACT : Findings differ from some in the literature and suggest the need for continued research on the use of CDT for smoking cessation. ©2011 AACR
RCT Entities: Population
Interventions
Outcomes
BACKGROUND: The current study evaluated the efficacy of an individualized, hand-held computer-delivered treatment (CDT ) versus standard treatment (ST ) for the maintenance of smoking abstinence following a quit attempt. METHODS: Participants were 303 adult daily smokers randomized to CDT or ST , plus pharmacotherapy. Abstinence though 1 year was examined using logistic random intercept models, a type of generalized linear mixed model regression. RESULTS: Results did not support the efficacy of the CDT program through 1 year postquit in analyses adjusted for time and study site (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.55-1.30), or after further adjusting for race/ethnicity, age, gender, education, marital status, and the number of cigarettes smoked per day before quitting (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.57-1.39). CONCLUSIONS: CDT did not increase short- or long-term abstinence rates over ST in this study. IMPACT: Findings differ from some in the literature and suggest the need for continued research on the use of CDT for smoking cessation. ©2011 AACR
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Gene
Species
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2011
PMID： 21613389 PMCID： PMC3132322 DOI： 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ISSN： 1055-9965 Impact factor: 4.254