Literature DB >> 21613266

In situ magnetic field exposure and ICNIRP-based safety distances for electronic article surveillance systems.

Wout Joseph1, Günter Vermeeren, Leen Verloock, Francis Goeminne.   

Abstract

Electromagnetic radiation of electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems was investigated in situ for both the detection gate panels and the activators and deactivators. 'Safety distances' for the general public, defined as the distances outside which the magnetic field levels of the EAS systems do not exceed the The International Commission on Non-ionising Radiation Protection reference levels, were determined. Additionally, temporal and frequency behaviour, and signal waveforms were investigated. For the detection gates, the spatially averaged fields exceeded the reference levels for five of the six investigated systems. For the (de)activators, the spatially averaged fields did not exceed the reference levels. Maximal fields up to 148.0 A m(-1) were measured from 20 cm on. The exposure ratios varied from 8 to 13 for EM, from 6 to 8 for AM and from 0.008 to 1.8 for RF systems. Safety distances were maximally 111 cm for EM, 77 cm for AM and 35 cm for RF systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21613266     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  5 in total

1.  Measurement and Exposure Assessment of Intermediate Frequency Magnetic Fields From Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) Gates in Libraries.

Authors:  Miwa Ikuyo; Kaoru Esaki; Atsuko Aimoto; Kanako Wake; Sachiko Yamaguchi-Sekino; Noriko Kojimahara; Yukihisa Suzuki; Masao Taki
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 2.  Review of Studies Concerning Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposure Assessment in Europe: Low Frequency Fields (50 Hz-100 kHz).

Authors:  Peter Gajšek; Paolo Ravazzani; James Grellier; Theodoros Samaras; József Bakos; György Thuróczy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Assessment of combined exposure to intermediate-frequency electromagnetic fields and pulsed electromagnetic fields among library workers in Japan.

Authors:  Sachiko Yamaguchi-Sekino; Masao Taki; Miwa Ikuyo; Kaoru Esaki; Atsuko Aimoto; Kanako Wake; Noriko Kojimahara
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-28

4.  Occupational exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic fields and brain tumor risk in the INTEROCC study: An individualized assessment approach.

Authors:  Javier Vila; Michelle C Turner; Esther Gracia-Lavedan; Jordi Figuerola; Joseph D Bowman; Laurel Kincl; Lesley Richardson; Geza Benke; Martine Hours; Daniel Krewski; Dave McLean; Marie-Elise Parent; Siegal Sadetzki; Klaus Schlaefer; Brigitte Schlehofer; Joachim Schüz; Jack Siemiatycki; Martie van Tongeren; Elisabeth Cardis
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 5.  A Source-based Measurement Database for Occupational Exposure Assessment of Electromagnetic Fields in the INTEROCC Study: A Literature Review Approach.

Authors:  Javier Vila; Joseph D Bowman; Lesley Richardson; Laurel Kincl; Dave L Conover; Dave McLean; Simon Mann; Paolo Vecchia; Martie van Tongeren; Elisabeth Cardis
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-10-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.