Literature DB >> 21612895

The PAW/GIPAW approach for computing NMR parameters: a new dimension added to NMR study of solids.

Thibault Charpentier1.   

Abstract

In 2001, Mauri and Pickard introduced the gauge including projected augmented wave (GIPAW) method that enabled for the first time the calculation of all-electron NMR parameters in solids, i.e. accounting for periodic boundary conditions. The GIPAW method roots in the plane wave pseudopotential formalism of the density functional theory (DFT), and avoids the use of the cluster approximation. This method has undoubtedly revitalized the interest in quantum chemical calculations in the solid-state NMR community. It has quickly evolved and improved so that the calculation of the key components of NMR interactions, namely the shielding and electric field gradient tensors, has now become a routine for most of the common nuclei studied in NMR. Availability of reliable implementations in several software packages (CASTEP, Quantum Espresso, PARATEC) make its usage more and more increasingly popular, maybe indispensable in near future for all material NMR studies. The majority of nuclei of the periodic table have already been investigated by GIPAW, and because of its high accuracy it is quickly becoming an essential tool for interpreting and understanding experimental NMR spectra, providing reliable assignments of the observed resonances to crystallographic sites or enabling a priori prediction of NMR data. The continuous increase of computing power makes ever larger (and thus more realistic) systems amenable to first-principles analysis. In the near future perspectives, as the incorporation of dynamical effects and/or disorder are still at their early developments, these areas will certainly be the prime target.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21612895     DOI: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2011.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Solid State Nucl Magn Reson        ISSN: 0926-2040            Impact factor:   2.293


  22 in total

1.  First principles NMR study of fluorapatite under pressure.

Authors:  Barbara Pavan; Davide Ceresoli; Mary M J Tecklenburg; Marco Fornari
Journal:  Solid State Nucl Magn Reson       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Composite-180° pulse-based symmetry sequences to recouple proton chemical shift anisotropy tensors under ultrafast MAS solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Pandey; Michal Malon; Ayyalusamy Ramamoorthy; Yusuke Nishiyama
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  "CLASSIC NMR": an in-situ NMR strategy for mapping the time-evolution of crystallization processes by combined liquid-state and solid-state measurements.

Authors:  Colan E Hughes; P Andrew Williams; Kenneth D M Harris
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Ab initio random structure searching of organic molecular solids: assessment and validation against experimental data.

Authors:  Miri Zilka; Dmytro V Dudenko; Colan E Hughes; P Andrew Williams; Simone Sturniolo; W Trent Franks; Chris J Pickard; Jonathan R Yates; Kenneth D M Harris; Steven P Brown
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  On the use of atomistic simulations to aid bulk metallic glasses structural elucidation with solid-state NMR.

Authors:  Ary R Ferreira; José P Rino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  An NMR Crystallographic Investigation of the Relationships between the Crystal Structure and 29Si Isotropic Chemical Shift in Silica Zeolites.

Authors:  Daniel M Dawson; Robert F Moran; Sharon E Ashbrook
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.126

7.  Determination of a complex crystal structure in the absence of single crystals: analysis of powder X-ray diffraction data, guided by solid-state NMR and periodic DFT calculations, reveals a new 2'-deoxyguanosine structural motif.

Authors:  Colan E Hughes; G N Manjunatha Reddy; Stefano Masiero; Steven P Brown; P Andrew Williams; Kenneth D M Harris
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 9.825

8.  Errors in the calculation of (27)Al nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts.

Authors:  Xianlong Wang; Chengfei Wang; Hui Zhao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Supercell program: a combinatorial structure-generation approach for the local-level modeling of atomic substitutions and partial occupancies in crystals.

Authors:  Kirill Okhotnikov; Thibault Charpentier; Sylvian Cadars
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.514

10.  Hunting for hydrogen: random structure searching and prediction of NMR parameters of hydrous wadsleyite.

Authors:  Robert F Moran; David McKay; Chris J Pickard; Andrew J Berry; John M Griffin; Sharon E Ashbrook
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.