Literature DB >> 21612328

Accuracy and diagnostic yield of CT-guided stereotactic liver biopsy of primary and secondary liver tumors.

Peter Schullian1, Gerlig Widmann, Thomas Bob Lang, Martin Knoflach, Reto Bale.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: CT-guided biopsy still plays a decisive role in the management of liver tumors, especially if the lesions are not visible or accessible by ultrasound. As CT-guided stereotaxy appears to be a very accurate targeting technique, the aim of this study was to evaluate the targeting accuracy, diagnostic yield, and complications of CT-guided stereotactic liver biopsy of primary and secondary liver tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Prior to stereotactic liver biopsy, patients under general anesthesia were immobilized using a vacuum cushion. Respiratory motion was controlled by temporary disconnections of the endotracheal tube. An optical-based navigation system was used for 3D trajectory planning and placement of a 15-G coaxial needle via a stereotactic aiming device. The histological samples were obtained using a 16-G Tru-Cut(™) biopsy needle system. For evaluation of targeting accuracy the control CT image with the needles in place was fused with the planning CT image. The lateral error at the tip and skin entry point and the angular error were calculated. In addition, the skin-to-liver-surface (SL) distance, the needle-to-liver-surface (NL) angle, and the presence of liver cirrhosis were evaluated. The diagnostic yield was evaluated by histological reports from the institutional pathologists.
RESULTS: The median lateral error was 2.5 mm (range: 0-6.5 mm) at the needle entry point and 3.2 mm (range: 0.01-9.4 mm) at the needle tip. The median angular error was 1.06° (range: 0-6.64°). Liver cirrhosis, NL angle and SL distance showed no significant impact on the targeting accuracy. Forty-five of the 46 liver biopsies (97.8%) were diagnostic according to the histological reports. No puncture-related complications such as bleeding or perforation of intestinal organs or lung tissue were recorded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21612328     DOI: 10.3109/10929088.2011.578367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Aided Surg        ISSN: 1092-9088


  8 in total

1.  Patient-specific needle guidance templates drilled intraprocedurally for image guided intervention: feasibility study in swine.

Authors:  Neil Glossop; Reto Bale; Sheng Xu; William F Pritchard; John W Karanian; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Comparison of a Robotic and Patient-Mounted Device for CT-Guided Needle Placement: A Phantom Study.

Authors:  Yannick Scharll; Alexander Mitteregger; Gregor Laimer; Christoph Schwabl; Peter Schullian; Reto Bale
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Simulated accuracy assessment of small footprint body-mounted probe alignment device for MRI-guided cryotherapy of abdominal lesions.

Authors:  Naoyuki Shono; Brian Ninni; Franklin King; Takahisa Kato; Junichi Tokuda; Takahiro Fujimoto; Kemal Tuncali; Nobuhiko Hata
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Impact factors for safety, success, duration and radiation exposure in CT-guided interventions.

Authors:  Maurice Pradella; Christoph Trumm; Bram Stieltjes; Daniel T Boll; Christoph J Zech; Rolf W Huegli
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Concepts for augmented reality visualisation to support needle guidance inside the MRI.

Authors:  André Mewes; Florian Heinrich; Bennet Hensen; Frank Wacker; Kai Lawonn; Christian Hansen
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2018-09-18

6.  Primary efficacy of percutaneous microwave ablation of malignant liver tumors: comparison of stereotactic and conventional manual guidance.

Authors:  Jan Schaible; Lukas Lürken; Philipp Wiggermann; Niklas Verloh; Ingo Einspieler; Florian Zeman; Andreas G Schreyer; Reto Bale; Christian Stroszczynski; Lukas Beyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  [Stereotaxy and robotics for ablation - toy or tool?].

Authors:  R Bale; G Widmann; W Jaschke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  In vivo cytological observation of liver and spleen by using high-resolution microendoscopy system under endoscopic ultrasound guidance: A preliminary study using a swine model.

Authors:  Rei Suzuki; Dongsuk Shin; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Lezlee Coghlan; Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.628

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.