Central nervous system failure in melanoma patients: results of a randomised, multicentre phase 3 study of temozolomide- and dacarbazine- based regimens.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the central nervous system (CNS) metastasis incidence between a temozolomide- and a dacarbazine-based regimen in untreated stage IV melanoma patients.
METHODS: A total of 150 patients were randomly assigned to receive either oral temozolomide (200 mg m(-2) per day; days 1-5) or intravenous dacarbazine (800 mg m(-2); day 1), in combination with intravenous cisplatin (75 mg m(-2); day 1) and subcutaneous interleukin-2 (3 MU twice daily; days 9-18), every 28 days (CTI and CDI).
RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were eligible for an intention-to-treat analysis (CTI: n=74, CDI: n=75). The 1-year cumulative CNS incidence failure was 20.6% for CTI and 31.1% for CDI (P=0.22). In all 24 patients in CTI (32%) and 34 (45%) in CDI developed CNS metastases; 31 patients died of early systemic progression, before CNS evaluation. Median survival time was 8.4 months in the CTI and 8.7 in the CDI arm; in patients with CNS metastases the median survival time was 13.5 months in the CTI and 11.5 in the CDI arm. No difference in toxicity was observed between the two arms.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of CNS failures in metastatic melanoma was not significantly reduced and the clinical course was not modified substituting a dacarbazine-based regimen with a temozolomide-based regimen. Patients who developed CNS metastases did not have a worse prognosis than patients progressing in other sites and should not be excluded from new investigational studies.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes

Melanoma incidence is increasing in Europe as well as in the USA and the prognosis of metastatic disease is very dismal with a median survival of 6–9 months and a 10-year survival of less than 10% (Bhatia ). Visceral metastases through haematogenous dissemination could be ubiquitous and central nervous system (CNS) involvement is quite frequent, reported in up to 46% of melanoma patients over their lifetime (Barnholtz-Sloan ; Houghton ). CNS recurrence is the first and often the only site of progression in up to 25% of responsive patients (Atkins ). Melanoma contributes to at least 10% of all CNS metastases (Wen ) and is second only to lung cancer (Barnholtz-Sloan ). More than 70% of patients who develop CNS metastases are diagnosed with multiple symptomatic lesions, excluded from studies with new drugs and treated only with symptomatic care. Therefore, the development of CNS metastases is considered more devastating and debilitating than other visceral metastatic sites. In the early stages of CNS metastasis growth, when the blood–brain barrier (BBB) is still intact, the different permeability of the drugs could be crucial (Gerstner and Fine, 2007). Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral imidazotetrazine second-generation alkylating agent that has shown some efficacy in metastatic melanoma and is active in primary brain tumours. TMZ has a high oral bio-availability and extensive tissue distribution, including penetration through the BBB and achievement of therapeutic concentrations in the CNS. A phase III trial showed that TMZ was as safe as, well tolerated and not less active than Dacarbazine (DTIC) (Middleton ). Paul first reported a reduction from 43 to 10% in CNS metastasis incidence in responsive TMZ-treated patients with respect to responsive DTIC-treated patients. Other authors observed a similar effect using combinations in which TMZ replaced DTIC (Atkins ; Ridolfi ; Ready ; Weber ; Ron ). The combination of TMZ with cisplatin is synergistic in in-vitro through the downregulation of the activity of the DNA repair enzyme o6–alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase, which mediates the resistance to TMZ. The safety of this combination has been tested (Piccioni ; D’Atri ) in vivo in advanced solid tumours (Britten ) and in melanoma.

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) was added to both combinations of cisplatin/DTIC (CDI) and cisplatin/TMZ (CTI) to increase the response rate, the progression-free (PFS) and possibly the overall survival (OS), as this was a common expectation when we planned this study (Eton ). This, however, was not confirmed in subsequent studies and in a meta-analysis (Ives ).

This phase III study was designed to verify whether the CTI combination significantly reduces or delays the incidence of CNS metastases compared with the CDI combination in metastatic, chemotherapy-naive, melanoma patients.

Patients and methods

Study design

The study was designed as a multicenter, randomised, open-label phase III trial. Randomisation was performed centrally at the Clinical Trials and Biostatistics Unit of the Istituto Oncologico Veneto. Treatment was assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio using a minimisation method over four stratification factors: gender, stage (M1a–M1b vs M1c), according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging 2002 (Balch ), serum LDH level (normal vs above normal) and centre.

Patient selection

Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV cutaneous melanoma, without evidence of CNS metastases by contrast-enhanced computed tomographic (CT) scan or gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were eligible.

Patients had to fulfil the following criteria: age ⩾18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0–2, a life expectancy of a least 10 weeks and adequate haematological function (absolute neutrophil count >1500 per mm3, platelet count >100 000 per mm3), hepatic function (total bilirubinemia <1.25 × upper limit of normal (ULN), 2.5 × ULN in case of liver metastases), aspartate amino transferase and alanine amino transferase <2 × ULN (3 × ULN in case of liver metastases) and renal function (serum creatinine <110 μmol l−1), and no previous malignancies except for adequately treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix or squamous carcinoma of the skin. Patients with uncontrollable angina, heart failure or infectious diseases were not eligible. Previous interferon adjuvant therapy or radiotherapy or isolated hyperthermic limb perfusion were permitted. Local Ethics Review Committee approval was obtained from all participating centres and written informed consent from all patients.

Treatment plan

Treatment consisted of either CTI or CDI. Cisplatin was administered intravenously at 75 mg m−2 on day 1, followed by oral TMZ at 200 mg m−2 per day for 5 days in the CTI arm or by intravenous DTIC at 800 mg m−2 on day 1 in the CDI arm. In both arms, patients also received 3 000 000 IU of subcutaneous IL-2 twice daily from days 9 to 17; subcutaneous G-CSF was recommended at a daily dose of 300 μg from days 6 to 12. Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days if absolute neutrophil count was >1500 per mm3, platelet count >100 000 per mm3 and serum creatinine <150 μmol l−1; otherwise, chemotherapy was delayed for 1 week. Before and 14 days after each cycle, clinical evaluation, haematology and biochemistry were repeated to evaluate toxicity. Cisplatin was decreased by 50% if serum creatinine was between 110 and 150 μmol l−1 with a creatinine clearance >45 ml per min despite sufficient hydration. Treatment was discontinued if serum creatinine was >150 μmol l−1 or creatinine clearance <45 ml per min despite sufficient hydration, or in case of grade 3 neurological toxicity or if the treatment had to be delayed for more than 2 consecutive weeks. TMZ or DTIC were decreased by 25% in case of grade 4 febrile neutropenia for more than 5 days, or grade 4 non-febrile neutropenia or grade 4 thrombocytopenia for more than 7 days during the previous cycle. This dose reduction was maintained thereafter.

Baseline evaluation and follow-up

Baseline evaluation included a complete medical history, physical examination, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS, chemistry tests, chest and abdominal CT scan, and cardiologic evaluation in the 30 days before randomisation. Any required laboratory assessment, which resulted abnormal had to be repeated within 48 h before enrolment. Detection of CNS metastases was carried out by brain CT scan systematically followed by MRI in case of single lesions potentially amenable to surgery or radio-surgery treatment. Complete and differential blood count was assessed every 2 weeks, and chemistry tests every four, during treatment. Chest and abdominal CT scan were repeated every 2 months during treatment, every 3 months in the first year after the end of treatment and every 6 months thereafter. Brain CT scan or MRI was repeated every 4 months during treatment and the first 2 years of follow-up, and every 6 months thereafter. Brain CT scan or MRI was required also at the time of progression.

Response and toxicity criteria

Toxicity was assessed at each cycle according to the NCI-CTC (version 3.0). Each serious adverse event was fully evaluated and, if drug related, a decision was made as to whether the risk/benefit justified the patient's continuation in the study. Each serious adverse event was reported to the competent authority and the drug producing company. Response was assessed according to the RECIST criteria in all patients who had completed at least one course of treatment. In the case of stable disease (SD) chemotherapy was continued till a maximum of six cycles. Chemotherapy was discontinued in the case of progressive disease (PD), or unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal.

Statistical methods

On the basis of our previous data (Ridolfi ), the 1-year incidence of CNS metastases was expected to be 30% in the CDI arm. An accrual of 148 patients in 2 years and a further follow-up of 1 year would provide the adequate power (80%) to detect a 57% reduction in the instantaneous risk of having CNS metastases, 12% in the CTI and 30% in the CDI arm (two-sided test, alpha-level: 5%). Analysis was performed on an intention to treat basis. In the two arms, patients should be followed until CNS relapse or death and for a follow-up period of at least 1 year.

Time to CNS metastases was the primary endpoint of the study and was defined as the time from randomisation to the radiological occurrence of CNS failure. The cumulative incidence of CNS metastases was estimated using a competing risk analysis, accounting for death resulting from all causes as a competing risk. To compare treatment groups, the Gray's test was used (Gray, 1988).

PFS and OS were analysed as secondary end points. PFS was defined as the time from randomisation to any type of progression or death from any cause. OS was defined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause. Both end points were estimated by means of the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test was used for comparisons.

To assess safety, the two arms were compared in terms of all grade distribution using the Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test. Difference in occurrence of grade 3/4 toxicity events between arms was assessed using the Fisher’s exact test.

All P-values were based on a two-sided test and statistical analyses were carried out using SAS statistical software (Release 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

From June 2003 to June 2007, 150 patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned by 12 Italian centres to receive either CTI (n=75) or CDI (n=75) (Figure 1). One patient in the CTI arm was excluded due to CNS metastases at randomisation.

Figure 1

CONSORT diagram.

Patients and known prognostic factors were well balanced in the two arms (Table 1). Fifty-three percent of the patients had stage M1c, 29% had an elevated serum LDH and 32% had received adjuvant therapy, consisting almost exclusively of high-dose interferon.

Table 1

Patient characteristics

	CDI arm (N=75)	CTI arm (N=74)
Age, years	54.5 (23–74)	51.2 (23–74)
Sex
Male	46 (61%)	45 (61%)
Female	29 (39%)	29 (39%)
ECOG-PS
0	52 (69%)	51 (69%)
1	15 (20%)	17 (23%)
2	3 (4%)	3 (4%)
Not reported	5 (7%)	3 (4%)
Disease site
M1a–M1b	35 (47%)	35 (47%)
M1c	40 (53%)	39 (53%)
LDH level
Abnormal	22 (29%)	21 (28%)
Normal	53 (71%)	53 (72%)
Time from diagnosis to metastatic disease, months	32.3 (1.8–164.9)	23.2 (0–159.7)

Abbreviations: CDI=DTIC-based chemotherapy; CTI=TMZ-based chemotherapy; DTIC=Dacarbazine; ECOG-PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; LH=lactate dehydrogenase; TMZ=Temozolomide.

Data are N (%) or median (range).

CNS failure

CNS failure was assessable in 118 patients, 57 in the CTI and 61 in the CDI arm. Of the 118 patients, 58 were positive at brain CT scan, 24 in the CTI and 34 in the CDI arm. The remaining 31 patients died after a median period of 3 months before CNS failure evaluation and of these, 13 died before undergoing any instrumental assessment of disease.

Figure 2 shows the cumulative incidence of the CNS metastases among patients treated with CTI and CDI. Death without CNS metastases was considered a competing event. The observed risk of a CNS relapse with CTI was not significantly different to that with CDI (P=0.22, Gray’s test).

Figure 2

Cumulative incidence function of central nervous system failure of patients receiving TMZ-based chemotherapy (CTI) and DTIC-based chemotherapy (CDI).

The 1-year cumulative CNS failure incidence was 20.6% for the CTI and 31.1% for the CDI, and the cause specific hazard ratio (HR) for CTI vs CDI was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.5, 1.5).

CNS metastases represented the first site of failure for 32 patients (12 in the CTI and 20 in the CDI arm) and for 26 patients the CNS relapse was preceded by a failure in another site.

Ten patients are still alive after a minimum follow-up of 46 months: four with CNS metastases, three with metastases in other sites and three in complete remission.

The clinical characteristics of CNS progressions did not differ in the two arms: 14 patients had a single lesion, six in the CTI and eight in the CDI arm, and 44 had multiple lesions: 18 in the CTI and 26 in the CDI arm.

Response

The OR rate was 18% in the CTI and 22% in the CDI arm (P=0.73, χ2-test). Complete remission occurred in 10 patients (7%), two in the CTI and eight in the CDI arm. An additional 30 patients (20%), 16 in the CTI and 14 in the CDI arm, presented SD.

The median PFS (Figure 3) was 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.5–5.4) in the CTI and 3.9 (95% CI: 2.8–5.1) in the CDI arm (P=0.90, log-rank test), and the HR for CTI vs CDI was 1.0 (95% CI: 0.7, 1.4). The 1-year PFS was 13.7% (95% CI: 7.0–22.6) in the CTI and 14.9 (95% CI: 7.9–23.9) in the CDI arm.

Figure 3

Kaplan–Meier curves for progression-free survival of patients receiving TMZ-based chemotherapy (CTI) and DTIC-based chemotherapy (CDI).

The median OS (Figure 4) was 8.4 months (95% CI: 7.0–10.5) in the CTI and 8.7 (95% CI: 7.3–13.2) in the CDI arm (P=0.40, log-rank test), and the HR for CTI vs CDI was 1.2 (95% CI: 0.8, 1.6). The 1-year OS was 31.2% (95% CI: 20.8–42.0) in the CTI and 41.9% (95% CI: 30.6–52.8) in the CDI arm.

Figure 4

Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival of patients receiving TMZ-based chemotherapy (CTI) and DTIC-based chemotherapy (CDI).

In patients with CNS failure, the median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI: 9.3–19.1) for the CTI and 11.5 (95% CI: 8.1–14.4) for the CDI arm (Figure 5, P=0.25, log-rank test), and the HR for CTI vs CDI was 0.7 (95% CI: 0.4,1.3).

Figure 5

Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival of patients with central nervous system failure receiving TMZ-based chemotherapy (CTI) and DTIC-based chemotherapy (CDI).

Safety

In the CTI arm, 22 patients (30%) completed the planned treatment and 52 stopped earlier, 7 (9%) for toxicity and 45 (61%) for PD, death or refusal. In the CDI arm, 26 patients (35%) completed the planned treatment and 49 stopped earlier, 1 for toxicity (1%) and 48 (64%) for PD, death or refusal. The mean delivered doses of cisplatin and IL-2 were the same in the two arms: 47 mg m−2 and 30 MU; 40 and 41 patients received G-CSF in the CTI and CDI arm, respectively.

Treatment was carried out almost entirely on an outpatient basis and patients were admitted only for disease palliation. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Haematological and non-haematological toxicities are summarised in Table 2. Haematological and flu-like symptoms were the most frequently observed toxicities in both arms, followed by nausea/vomit and liver enzyme abnormalities. The distribution of all grade toxicity was similar in the two groups, except for anaemia, which was higher in the CTI arm (P=0.01, Wilcoxon's rank-sum test).

Table 2

Treatment toxicity

	CDI arm (N=74)			CTI arm (N=74)
	All grades	Grade 3	Grade 4	All grades	Grade 3	Grade 4
Fatigue	45 (61%)	11 (15%)	1 (1%)	43 (58%)	11 (15%)	2 (3%)
Fever	38 (51%)	5 (7%)	—	40 (54%)	7 (9%)	—
Nausea/vomiting	47 (63%)	11 (15%)	—	44 (59%)	7 (9%)	—
Constipation	8 (11%)	—	—	9 (12%)	—	—
Diarrhoea	5 (7%)	—	—	5 (7%)	—	—
Anorexia	15 (20%)	6 (8%)	—	17 (23%)	3 (4%)	1 (1%)
Leukocytes	14 (19%)	1 (1%)	1 (1%)	21 (28%)	3 (4%)	2 (3%)
Neutropenia	28 (38%)	7 (9%)	4 (5%)	29 (39%)	10 (14%)	7 (9%)
Thrombocytopenia	23 (31%)	3 (4%)	2 (3%)	22 (30%)	3 (4%)	4 (5%)
Anaemia	23 (31%)	3 (4%)	—	35 (47%)	6 (8%)	1 (1%)
Lymphopenia	7 (9%)	2 (3%)	—	10 (14%)	1 (1%)	2 (3%)
Liver function	23 (31%)	3 (4%)	—	18 (24%)	3 (4%)	2 (3%)

Abbreviations: CDI=DTIC-based chemotherapy; CTI=TMZ-based chemotherapy; DTIC=Dacarbazine; TMZ=Temozolomide.

Data are N (%).

Discussion

This is the first prospective study designed to test whether TMZ is able to decrease the incidence and alter the clinical course of CNS metastases in melanoma patients. When we planned this trial in 2001, bio-chemotherapy was still considered a promising approach able to produce objective tumour responses in up to 40% of treated patients. As a high activity was crucial for the purpose of our study, we chose to compare TMZ and DTIC not alone but in combination with cisplatin and IL-2 (Eton ).

The clinical activity observed in the two arms is similar to that published using these combinations (Bafaloukos ; Gonzalez Cao ; Wierzbicka-Hainaut ). The incidence of CNS failure in the CDI arm was as expected and consistent with our previous experience using dacarbazine alone or in combination. Instead, the incidence in the CTI arm was higher than planned and previously published, particularly in responsive patients where it reached 60%. This finding can be explained by the specific design of the study where CNS imaging every 4 months detected asymptomatic CNS metastases in more than 50% of patients. Neither the incidence of CNS recurrences nor the clinical course of the CNS involvement were significantly influenced by TMZ. In fact, the percentage of single or multiple lesions, as well as the overall survival in patients with CNS relapses and the incidence of CNS failure as first site of metastasis, were similar in the two arms. The significant reduction reported by Paul was observed in a retrospective analysis of different studies where the CNS relapses were not specifically sought-after and the radiological confirmation of clinical suspicion was not mandatory. Likewise, no specific follow-up, aimed at detecting asymptomatic lesions, was reported in the study by Ron , where no CNS recurrences were observed in 10 responding patients. Weber , although declaring the analysis was not planned in advance, reported a significant reduction from 33 to 6% in CNS failure, as first site of recurrence, comparing a TMZ bio-chemotherapy combination with patients previously treated with a DTIC bio-chemotherapy regimen. Instead, when a brain imaging follow-up was planned, as in the phase II trial by Gonzalez Cao where brain MRI was carried out every 3 months, the CNS failure rate observed with a TMZ schedule was similar to that observed with a DTIC regimen. A high percentage of CNS recurrences (10 out of 28 patients) has also recently been reported by Wierzbicka-Hainaut , in a phase II study with cisplatin and TMZ. Besides the drawbacks of being either phase II or retrospective, all these studies seem to indicate that CNS failure is more related to the modality and timing to detect it, than to the regimen used. Moreover, considering or not the early progressions in other visceral sites as competitive with the CNS failures could influence the results.

This study was powered to detect an absolute 18% reduction of CNS failure as expected from previous phase II studies (Atkins ; Paul ), therefore we can not exclude that a larger study could be statistically significant. However, in our opinion, the main reason for the inefficacy or low efficacy in preventing or significantly delaying the CNS recurrence is related to the low systemic activity of TMZ and all chemotherapy combinations in metastatic melanoma. Our study highlights that patients who developed CNS metastases did not have a worse prognosis than other patients progressing in other sites and represent 40% of long-survivors. Therefore, we firmly believe that CNS metastases should not be an exclusion criterion for new investigational studies.

In the early stage of the CNS metastasis process, the BBB is a key point. In established CNS metastases there is disruption and leakiness of the BBB due to hydrostatic pressure, tumour size and ischaemia. Therefore, when the lesions are well established, the specific activity of the drug is crucial to obtain a clinical effect. Different tumour types have different BBB permeability depending on tumour cell expression or secretion of specific molecules (Cordon-Cardo ; Toth ). Thus, in order to decrease CNS progression in melanoma patients, we need drugs with a greater systemic activity, able to cross the BBB and active in the CNS growing metastatic cells (Gerstner and Fine, 2007). A more successful control of systemic disease with a drug unable to cross the BBB and not effective in CNS metastases, could lead to an increase in the CNS failures (Ono ). The increased incidence of CNS metastases in breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab (Bendell ), supports this concept. Considering our findings and all these aspects, we believe that any new drug with some activity in melanoma should be evaluated also for its effect on CNS metastasis incidence. Owing to the high propensity of melanoma cells to metastasise to the brain, drugs unable to reach or ineffective in this site, risk having a limited impact on the clinical course of the disease.

Even if the reliability of our results could be questioned by the small sample size, the global and 1-year incidence of CNS metastases in melanoma patients is not significantly reduced by TMZ in combination with cisplatin and IL-2 vs the same combination with DTIC. We believe that this failure should be ascribed to the low systemic activity of this combination and to the high propensity of melanoma to develop CNS metastases.