OBJECTIVES: Long-term exposure to ambient fine particles (PM2.)) has been shown to increase mortality. Variables measured on the same spatial scales of air pollution may confound associations, and so the authors' objectives were to evaluate the associations between PM2.5 and individual-level measures of smoking, obesity and sociodemographic status. The authors present an approach to evaluate the impact that uncontrolled confounding from smoking may have on associations between PM2.5 and mortality. METHODS: Individual-level behavioural and sociodemographic data were obtained from a 2003 national survey of 122,548 Canadians. Estimates of ground-level PM2.5 at a resolution of 10×10 km between 2001 and 2006 were derived from satellite remote sensing. Exposures were assigned to the residence of the participants at the time of the survey. Differences in the prevalence of smoking across concentrations of PM2.5 and RRs drawn from the literature were used to model the bias on rate ratios. RESULTS: Participants in areas with higher concentrations of PM2.5 had a higher income and educational attainment, smoked less and were more likely immigrants. Smoking had a negative confounding effect on the associations between PM2.5) and mortality. To compensate for this bias, for a 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5, mortality from lung cancer and heart disease in the referent exposure group needed to be increased by 6.9% and 3.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Associations were found between sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics and PM2.5 at a resolution of 10×10 km. The authors present a model to adjust for uncontrolled confounding of smoking that can be readily adapted to exposures measured at different spatial resolutions.
OBJECTIVES: Long-term exposure to ambient fine particles (PM2.)) has been shown to increase mortality. Variables measured on the same spatial scales of air pollution may confound associations, and so the authors' objectives were to evaluate the associations between PM2.5 and individual-level measures of smoking, obesity and sociodemographic status. The authors present an approach to evaluate the impact that uncontrolled confounding from smoking may have on associations between PM2.5 and mortality. METHODS: Individual-level behavioural and sociodemographic data were obtained from a 2003 national survey of 122,548 Canadians. Estimates of ground-level PM2.5 at a resolution of 10×10 km between 2001 and 2006 were derived from satellite remote sensing. Exposures were assigned to the residence of the participants at the time of the survey. Differences in the prevalence of smoking across concentrations of PM2.5 and RRs drawn from the literature were used to model the bias on rate ratios. RESULTS:Participants in areas with higher concentrations of PM2.5 had a higher income and educational attainment, smoked less and were more likely immigrants. Smoking had a negative confounding effect on the associations between PM2.5) and mortality. To compensate for this bias, for a 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5, mortality from lung cancer and heart disease in the referent exposure group needed to be increased by 6.9% and 3.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Associations were found between sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics and PM2.5 at a resolution of 10×10 km. The authors present a model to adjust for uncontrolled confounding of smoking that can be readily adapted to exposures measured at different spatial resolutions.
Authors: Weeberb J Requia; Matthew D Adams; Altaf Arain; Stefania Papatheodorou; Petros Koutrakis; Moataz Mahmoud Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Marie Kruse; Bjørn Sætterstrøm; Jakob Bønløkke; Henrik Brønnum-Hansen; Esben Meulengracht Flachs; Jan Sørensen Journal: J Environ Public Health Date: 2012-07-29
Authors: Douglas O Johns; Lindsay Wichers Stanek; Katherine Walker; Souad Benromdhane; Bryan Hubbell; Mary Ross; Robert B Devlin; Daniel L Costa; Daniel S Greenbaum Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Dan L Crouse; Paul A Peters; Aaron van Donkelaar; Mark S Goldberg; Paul J Villeneuve; Orly Brion; Saeeda Khan; Dominic Odwa Atari; Michael Jerrett; C Arden Pope; Michael Brauer; Jeffrey R Brook; Randall V Martin; David Stieb; Richard T Burnett Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Ikenna C Eze; Emmanuel Schaffner; Maria Foraster; Medea Imboden; Arnold von Eckardstein; Margaret W Gerbase; Thomas Rothe; Thierry Rochat; Nino Künzli; Christian Schindler; Nicole Probst-Hensch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: David M Stieb; Li Chen; Bernardo S Beckerman; Michael Jerrett; Daniel L Crouse; D Walter Rasugu Omariba; Paul A Peters; Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin; Richard T Burnett; Nicolas L Gilbert; Michael Tjepkema; Shiliang Liu; Rose M Dugandzic Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Paul H Fischer; Marten Marra; Caroline B Ameling; Gerard Hoek; Rob Beelen; Kees de Hoogh; Oscar Breugelmans; Hanneke Kruize; Nicole A H Janssen; Danny Houthuijs Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Robert D Brook; Sabit Cakmak; Michelle C Turner; Jeffrey R Brook; Dan L Crouse; Paul A Peters; Aaron van Donkelaar; Paul J Villeneuve; Orly Brion; Michael Jerrett; Randall V Martin; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Mark S Goldberg; C Arden Pope; Richard T Burnett Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Hong Chen; Richard T Burnett; Jeffrey C Kwong; Paul J Villeneuve; Mark S Goldberg; Robert D Brook; Aaron van Donkelaar; Michael Jerrett; Randall V Martin; Jeffrey R Brook; Ray Copes Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2013-04-26 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Louis-Francois Tétreault; Marieve Doucet; Philippe Gamache; Michel Fournier; Allan Brand; Tom Kosatsky; Audrey Smargiassi Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 9.031