AIMS: To assess the utilization of antihypertensive drugs among uncomplicated hypertensive patients in Finland between 2000 and 2006 and to calculate the achievable reduction in cardiovascular morbidity, with intensified antihypertensive treatment. METHODS: From the databases of the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, 428,986 treated hypertensives without diabetes or cardiac disease (further named uncomplicated hypertensives) in 2000 and 591,206 in 2006, respectively, were identified. In addition, from the Health 2000 survey representing the whole Finnish adult population, 729 uncomplicated hypertensives were determined to assess their characteristics and control of hypertension. Applying Law's meta-analyses we calculated the reduction of blood pressure (BP) by intensifying the treatment with low-dose antihypertensive regimens for those with a BP ≥140/90 mmHg. RESULTS: The nationwide data suggests a relative overuse of beta-blockers. Combination antihypertensive treatment increased relatively 8%, while at least three drug combinations increased from 19.8% to 21.6% between 2000 and 2006. However, calculated prevalence of controlled BP (<140/90 mmHg) increased only from 30.3% to 33.9%. Addition of one half standard dose or one to two half standard doses for the treatment of the patients with a BP ≥140/90 mmHg would improve the control of hypertension from 33.9% to 47.8% and 67.3%, respectively. The intensified treatment would reduce strokes by 18% and 28%, and ischaemic heart disease events by 13% and 21%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Underutilization of preferred drugs and poor control of BP continues. Surprisingly small addition of the number of low-dose antihypertensive regimen is needed in order to substantially improve the control of hypertension and to decrease cardiovascular morbidity among uncomplicated hypertensive patients.
AIMS: To assess the utilization of antihypertensive drugs among uncomplicated hypertensivepatients in Finland between 2000 and 2006 and to calculate the achievable reduction in cardiovascular morbidity, with intensified antihypertensive treatment. METHODS: From the databases of the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, 428,986 treated hypertensives without diabetes or cardiac disease (further named uncomplicated hypertensives) in 2000 and 591,206 in 2006, respectively, were identified. In addition, from the Health 2000 survey representing the whole Finnish adult population, 729 uncomplicated hypertensives were determined to assess their characteristics and control of hypertension. Applying Law's meta-analyses we calculated the reduction of blood pressure (BP) by intensifying the treatment with low-dose antihypertensive regimens for those with a BP ≥140/90 mmHg. RESULTS: The nationwide data suggests a relative overuse of beta-blockers. Combination antihypertensive treatment increased relatively 8%, while at least three drug combinations increased from 19.8% to 21.6% between 2000 and 2006. However, calculated prevalence of controlled BP (<140/90 mmHg) increased only from 30.3% to 33.9%. Addition of one half standard dose or one to two half standard doses for the treatment of the patients with a BP ≥140/90 mmHg would improve the control of hypertension from 33.9% to 47.8% and 67.3%, respectively. The intensified treatment would reduce strokes by 18% and 28%, and ischaemic heart disease events by 13% and 21%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Underutilization of preferred drugs and poor control of BP continues. Surprisingly small addition of the number of low-dose antihypertensive regimen is needed in order to substantially improve the control of hypertension and to decrease cardiovascular morbidity among uncomplicated hypertensivepatients.