Literature DB >> 21609379

Should births be centralised in higher level hospitals? Experiences from regionalised health care in Finland.

E Hemminki1, A Heino, M Gissler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe: (i) trends in centralisation and unplanned out-of-hospital births; (ii) perinatal mortality by place of birth; and (iii) health and birth outcomes in areas served by hospitals of different levels.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of medical birth register data.
SETTING: Finland, from 1991 to 2008, and Uusimaa district from 2004 to 2008. POPULATION: All births.
METHODS: In the hospital-based analysis, birthweight was adjusted by logistic regression. In the area-based analysis results were calculated according to where women lived, grouping them into areas served by different hospitals. The mother's background characteristics were adjusted for by logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Place of birth, unplanned out-of-hospital birth, perinatal mortality, newborn outcomes, and birth procedures.
RESULTS: The number of birthing hospitals declined, the mean number of births per hospital increased, and more births, particularly high-risk births, occurred in university hospitals. Unplanned out-of-hospital births were rare, and their numbers increased in the 2000s, but regional differences declined. Perinatal mortality was higher in the university hospitals than in other hospitals, but after adjusting for birthweight, it was lower. Among children weighing more than 2500 g, mortality was similar for all hospital levels. In out-of-hospital births, perinatal mortality was much higher than in other children. The area-based analysis did not systematically show better or worse results for the areas served by lower level hospitals: after adjusting for the background characteristics of the mothers, all differences were found to be small.
CONCLUSIONS: The health and service data do not support the need to close down small hospitals in a regionalised system where there is a referral system that functions well.
© 2011 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2011 RCOG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21609379     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02977.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  13 in total

1.  The impact of hospital obstetric volume on maternal outcomes in term, non-low-birthweight pregnancies.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Yvonne W Cheng; Cathy L Emeis; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Safety of labour and delivery following closures of obstetric services in small community hospitals.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hutcheon; Corinne A Riddell; Erin C Strumpf; Lily Lee; Sam Harper
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Regionalization of neonatal care: benefits, barriers, and beyond.

Authors:  Sara C Handley; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The association between hospital obstetric volume and perinatal outcomes in California.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Yvonne W Cheng; Caitlin P Kontgis; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Why babies die in unplanned out-of-institution births: an enquiry into perinatal deaths in Norway 1999-2013.

Authors:  Björn Gunnarsson; Sigurd Fasting; Eirik Skogvoll; Alexander K Smárason; Kjell Å Salvesen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Urgent EMS managed out-of-hospital delivery dispatches in Helsinki.

Authors:  Jussi Pirneskoski; Katja Peräjoki; Mika Nuutila; Markku Kuisma
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Centralized or decentralized perinatal surgical care for rural women: a realist review of the evidence on safety.

Authors:  Jude Kornelsen; Kevin McCartney; Kim Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Improving Research into Models of Maternity Care to Inform Decision Making.

Authors:  Ank de Jonge; Jane Sandall
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Accessibility of general and specialized obstetric care providers in Germany and England: an analysis of location and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  Jan Bauer; David A Groneberg; Werner Maier; Roxanne Manek; Frank Louwen; Dörthe Brüggmann
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.918

10.  Emergency medical technicians' experiences with unplanned births outside institutions: A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Hanne Vagle; Gunn Terese Haukeland; Bente Dahl; Vigdis Aasheim; Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.