Literature DB >> 21609240

Prevalence and risk factors for anisometropia in the Tehran eye study, Iran.

Hassan Hashemi1, Mehdi Khabazkhoob, Abbasali Yekta, Kazem Mohammad, Akbar Fotouhi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of anisometropia and its determinants in a population-based sample.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional population-based study, stratified cluster sampling was carried out from the population of Tehran. Respondents were transferred to a clinic for an interview and ophthalmic examinations including tests for visual acuity with and without correction, cycloplegic refraction, the slit lamp examination, fundoscopy, and lensometry. Anisometropia was defined as unequal spherical equivalent cycloplegic refractions in the two eyes.
RESULTS: Of 4565 participants, cycloplegic refraction was performed in both eyes of 3519 people. The mean age of the examinees was 31.5 ± 18.0 (range, 5-86) years. The mean anisometropia was 0.34 diopter (D) (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.31-0.37). The prevalence rates of anisometropia more than 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 D were 18.5% (95% CI: 17.0-19.9), 6.7% (95% CI: 5.8-7.7), 3.8% (95% CI: 3.1-4.5) and 2.6% (95% CI: 2.1-3.1). The inter-gender difference in the prevalence of anisometropia ≥ 1.0D was not statistically significant (P = 0.952). The prevalence of anisometropia increased after the age of 45 years. Overall, 15.7% of the examinees had anisomyopia and 4.7% had anisohypermetropia equal to or more than 1.0D. Anisometropia was more prevalent among patients with cataracts, amblyopia, and pseudophakia. The prevalence rates of spherical and cylindrical anisometropia in the studied sample were 8.0% and 7.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anisometropia in the population of Tehran is beyond negligible. It showed a significant increase with age. Results also indicate that myopic patients are more likely to have anisometropia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21609240     DOI: 10.3109/09286586.2011.574333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol        ISSN: 0928-6586            Impact factor:   1.648


  7 in total

1.  Limited change in anisometropia and aniso-axial length over 13 years in myopic children enrolled in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial.

Authors:  Li Deng; Jane Gwiazda; Ruth E Manny; Mitchell Scheiman; Erik Weissberg; Karen D Fern; Katherine Weise
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Ciliary muscle thickness in anisometropia.

Authors:  Mallory K Kuchem; Loraine T Sinnott; Chiu-Yen Kao; Melissa D Bailey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Anisometropia in children from infancy to 15 years.

Authors:  Li Deng; Jane E Gwiazda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  The prevalence of amblyopia in Iran: A systematic review.

Authors:  Maryam Chegeni; Narges Khanjani; Pardis Rahmatpour; Mahin Ahmadi Pishkuhi; Nafiseh Abdolalian
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-27

5.  Design and baseline data of a population-based metabonomics study of eye diseases in eastern China: the Yueqing Ocular Diseases Investigation.

Authors:  Yuxuan Deng; Yuanbo Liang; Sigeng Lin; Liang Wen; Jin Li; Yue Zhou; Meixiao Shen; Jingwei Zheng; Kemi Feng; Yanting Sun; Kwapong Willaim Robert; Jia Qu; Fan Lu
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-01-19

6.  Prevalence of refractive errors; the yazd eye study.

Authors:  Hossein Ziaei; Marzieh Katibeh; Reza Solaimanizad; Sara Hosseini; Hamid-Reza Gilasi; Faegheh Golbafian; Mohammad-Ali Javadi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2013-07

7.  Interocular Difference of Peripheral Refraction in Anisomyopic Eyes of Schoolchildren.

Authors:  Junhong Chen; Ji C He; Yunyun Chen; Jingjing Xu; Haoran Wu; Feifu Wang; Fan Lu; Jun Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.