Literature DB >> 21607887

Biomechanical effect after Coflex and Coflex rivet implantation for segmental instability at surgical and adjacent segments: a finite element analysis.

Cheng-Chan Lo1, Kai-Jow Tsai, Shih-Hao Chen, Zheng-Cheng Zhong, Chinghua Hung.   

Abstract

The Coflex device may provide stability to the surgical segment in extension but does not restore stability in other motion. Recently, a modified version called the Coflex rivet has been developed. The effects of Coflex and Coflex rivet implantation on the adjacent segments are still not clear; therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical differences between Coflex and Coflex rivet implantation by using finite element analyses. The results show that the Coflex implantation can provide stability in extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at the surgical segment, and it had no influence at adjacent segments except for extension. The Coflex rivet implantation can provide stability in all motions and reduce disc annulus stress at the surgical segment. Therefore, the higher range of motion and stress induced by the Coflex rivet at both adjacent discs may result in adjacent segment degeneration in flexion and extension.
© 2011 Taylor & Francis

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21607887     DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2010.502894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  7 in total

1.  Establishment and validation of a T12-L2 3D finite element model for thoracolumbar segments.

Authors:  Hui Lu; Qichuan Zhang; Fan Ding; Qimei Wu; Rong Liu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Biomechanical effect of Coflex and X-STOP spacers on the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Guo; Guangfei Liu; Lu Wang; Yuejiang Zhao; Ye Zhao; Shouliang Lu; Cai Cheng
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  Biomechanical Comparison of Spinal Fusion Methods Using Interspinous Process Compressor and Pedicle Screw Fixation System Based on Finite Element Method.

Authors:  Jisoo Choi; Sohee Kim; Dong-Ah Shin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-02-29

4.  Interlaminar stabilization offers greater biomechanical advantage compared to interspinous stabilization after lumbar decompression: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Teng Lu; Yi Lu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Effect of different designs of interspinous process devices on the instrumented and adjacent levels after double-level lumbar decompression surgery: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hao-Ju Lo; Hung-Ming Chen; Yi-Jie Kuo; Sai-Wei Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Biomechanical comparison of different interspinous process devices in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Zhengpeng Liu; Shuyi Zhang; Jia Li; Hai Tang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  Effectiveness of dynamic fixation Coflex treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jun-Xi Zhang; Xi-Wei Jing; Ping Cui; Xin He; Ding-Jun Hao; Shu-Jing Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.447

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.