Literature DB >> 21606855

Lumbarized sacrum as a relative contraindication for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion at L5-6.

William D Smith1, Jim A Youssef, Ginger Christian, Sherrie Serrano, Jonathan A Hyde.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if lumbarized sacra at the L5-6 level (functional L4-5) are a contraindication to a lateral transpsoas approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Transitional vertebrae at the lumbosacral junction present mechanical and morphologic changes, though these changes have not been characterized with respect to the feasibility of a lateral transpsoas approach.
METHODS: Three hundred fifty-one patients were scheduled for lumbar interbody fusion using a mini-open lateral transpsoas approach (XLIF) at L4-5 from 2004 to 2008 at a single institution. In patients with 6 lumbar vertebrae, accessibility, based on neuromonitoring, of the L5-6 level (functional L4-5) was reviewed. Qualitative assessments using axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed and compared with a sample of patients with normal anatomy treated at L4-5.
RESULTS: Of the 351 patients scheduled for treatment at L4-5, 10 (2.8%) were determined to have 6 lumbar vertebrae with the symptomatic level at L5-6. Of those 10, 2 (20%) could be treated using a lateral transpsoas approach, and 8 (80%) were converted to another approach after a corridor through the psoas muscle was not found, based on neuromonitoring feedback. Review of axial MRI showed a teardrop-shaped psoas detached from the lateral border of the disc space in patients with transitional anatomy unapproachable at L5-6, resemblant of L5-S1 in normal anatomy. In the 2 patients who could be safely approached, the psoas anatomy at L5-6 was similar to a normal L4-5 level, with a domed/helmet shape, attached laterally to the disc space.
CONCLUSIONS: Treating the L5-6 level using a lateral transpsoas approach in individuals with lumbarized sacra can be challenging due to anatomy more similar to the L5-S1 level in normal patients. Preoperative planning using axial MRI and intraoperative adherence to advanced neuromonitoring can aid in identifying and avoiding injury in these rare patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21606855     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31821e262f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  12 in total

Review 1.  Rational decision making in a wide scenario of different minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion approaches and devices.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Antoine Tohmeh; David Jones; Rodrigo Amaral; Luis Marchi; Leonardo Oliveira; Bruce C Pittman; Hyun Bae
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

Review 2.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A Review of Symptomatic Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: Bertolotti's Syndrome.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Jancuska; Jeffrey M Spivak; John A Bendo
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-29

Review 4.  Minimally invasive spine surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Péter Banczerowski; Gábor Czigléczki; Zoltán Papp; Róbert Veres; Harry Zvi Rappaport; János Vajda
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (DW-MR) neurography of the lumbar plexus in the preoperative planning of lateral access lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Cristiano Magalhães Menezes; Luciene Mota de Andrade; Carlos Fernando Pereira da Silva Herrero; Helton Luiz Defino; Marcos Antonio Ferreira Júnior; William Blake Rodgers; Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review.

Authors:  Mark J Winder; Shanu Gambhir
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

7.  Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive, lateral, transpsoas approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Kaveh Khajavi; Alessandria Y Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Relationship between psoas muscle dimensions and post operative thigh pain. A possible preoperative evaluation factor.

Authors:  Josip Buric
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 9.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: What Is the Evidence of Indirect Neural Decompression? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Emanuele Quarto; Andrea Zanirato; Lorenzo Mosconi; Davide Vallerga; Irene Zotta; Maddalena Lontaro Baracchini; Carlo Formica; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-03-20

10.  Clinical outcome and fusion rates after the first 30 extreme lateral interbody fusions.

Authors:  Gregory M Malham; Ngaire J Ellis; Rhiannon M Parker; Kevin A Seex
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.