Literature DB >> 21606848

General principles of medical surveillance: implications for workers potentially exposed to nanomaterials.

Douglas B Trout1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As potential occupational exposure to nanomaterials becomes more prevalent, it is important that the principles of medical surveillance be considered for workers in the nanotechnology industry.
METHODS: The principles of medical surveillance are reviewed to further the discussion of occupational health surveillance for workers exposed to nanomaterials.
RESULTS: Because of the rapid evolution of nanotechnology, information may not be available to make a well-informed determination of all factors needed to evaluate risk of health effects from occupational exposure to nanomaterials.
CONCLUSION: Every workplace dealing with engineered nanomaterials should conduct hazard and exposure assessments as part of an overall surveillance needs assessment for nanotechnology workers. In workplaces where risk is felt to be present, or at least cannot be ruled out, initiation of medical surveillance is prudent to protect workers' health.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21606848      PMCID: PMC4576833          DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b1e45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  6 in total

Review 1.  Medical surveillance and screening in the workplace: complementary preventive strategies.

Authors:  M Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Hazard surveillance at NIOSH.

Authors:  D S Sundin; T M Frazier
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The role of surveillance in the hierarchy of prevention.

Authors:  W E Halperin
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Medical screening in the workplace: proposed principles.

Authors:  W E Halperin; J Ratcliffe; T M Frazier; L Wilson; S P Becker; P A Schulte
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1986-08

5.  Hazard surveillance in occupational disease.

Authors:  J Froines; D Wegman; E Eisen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Sentinel Health Events (occupational): a basis for physician recognition and public health surveillance.

Authors:  D D Rutstein; R J Mullan; T M Frazier; W E Halperin; J M Melius; J P Sestito
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 9.308

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Taking stock of the occupational safety and health challenges of nanotechnology: 2000-2015.

Authors:  P A Schulte; G Roth; L L Hodson; V Murashov; M D Hoover; R Zumwalde; E D Kuempel; C L Geraci; A B Stefaniak; V Castranova; J Howard
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 2.  Systematic Review of Screening and Surveillance Programs to Protect Workers from Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Mary Gulumian; Jos Verbeek; Charlene Andraos; Natasha Sanabria; Pieter de Jager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.