Literature DB >> 21606754

Management of the adnexal mass.

James H Liu1, Kristine M Zanotti.   

Abstract

Adnexal masses are commonly encountered in gynecologic practice and often present both diagnostic and management challenges. This is partly because of the fact that the majority of adnexal masses that are identified represent benign entities that do not necessarily require active intervention, yet a small subset will represent malignant processes that require both timely and appropriate surgical intervention for optimal outcome. To determine the best diagnostic and management strategies in this setting, physicians must effectively triage risk for malignancy by having a thorough understanding of the entities on the differential diagnosis and carefully considering the clinical context for each individual patient. Optimal selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests are enhanced by both an accurate clinical risk assessment and an understanding of the inherent accuracy of diagnostic tests considered in this setting. The purpose of this document is to provide clinicians with a practical strategy for distinguishing benign and malignant masses in the nonpregnant woman. Our approach addresses the critical elements of accurate risk stratification, reviews the performance of diagnostic tests for identifying malignancy, and offers evidence-based management algorithms to optimize outcomes for women with adnexal masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21606754     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c62b6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of Adnexal Mass in Women Undergoing Mass Excision During the Antepartum Period and Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Nafiseh Saghafi; Zohreh Yousefi Roodsary; Sima Kadkhodaeian; Maliheh Hasanzadeh Mofrad; Elham Hosseini Farahabadi; Mohammadreza Hoseinyfarahabady
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2016-05

2.  A minimally invasive approach with fertility preservation in a young woman with distinct bilateral ovarian masses: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Márcia M Carneiro; Ivete de Ávila; Patrícia S Gouvea; Maria das Graças M Torres; Ivone D S Filogônio
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2014-03-27

3.  Quantitative global lipidomics analysis of patients with ovarian cancer versus benign adnexal mass.

Authors:  Matthew F Buas; Charles W Drescher; Nicole Urban; Christopher I Li; Lisa Bettcher; Nitai C Hait; Kirsten B Moysich; Kunle Odunsi; Daniel Raftery; Li Yan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Borderline tumours of the ovary, current controversies regarding their diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  María Guadalupe Patrono; Lucas Minig; Ivan Diaz-Padilla; Nuria Romero; Juan Francisco Rodriguez Moreno; Jesus Garcia-Donas
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2013-12-17

5.  Criteria for selection of laparoscopy for women with adnexal mass.

Authors:  Amilcar Barreta; Luis Felipe Sallum; Luis Otávio Sarian; Joana Fróes Bragança Bastos; Sophie Derchain
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for adnexal masses: role in elderly.

Authors:  F M Pulcinelli; M Schimberni; R Marci; F Bellati; D Caserta
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  An adolescent with an asymptomatic adnexal cyst: To worry or not to worry? Medical versus surgical management options.

Authors:  Vincenzo De Sanctis; Ashraf T Soliman; Heba Elsedfy; Nada A Soliman; Rania Elalaily; Salvatore Di Maio; Alaa Y Ahmed; Giuseppe Millimaggi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2017-08-23

8.  Mucinous Borderline Ovarian Tumor in Very Old Aged Postmenopausal Woman.

Authors:  Seung-Hee Lee; Tae-Hee Kim; Hae-Hyeog Lee; Arum Lee; Yeon-Suk Kim; Dong-Su Jeon; Jeong Ja Kwak; Yo-Sep Yang
Journal:  J Menopausal Med       Date:  2015-12-25

9.  Comparison of conventional, doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lizhang Xun; Lamei Zhai; Hui Xu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  A multidisciplinary approach remains the best strategy to improve and strengthen the management of ovarian cancer (Review).

Authors:  Luca Falzone; Giuseppa Scandurra; Valentina Lombardo; Giuseppe Gattuso; Alessandro Lavoro; Andrea Benedetto Distefano; Giuseppe Scibilia; Paolo Scollo
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.